FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 8
Congressional review
5 U.S.C. § 801
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
Chapter8 — CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 801 (Congressional review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 801.
Text
(a)(1)(A) Before a rule can take effect, the Federal agency promulgating such rule shall submit to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General a report containing—
(i)a copy of the rule;
(ii)a concise general statement relating to the rule, including whether it is a major rule; and
(iii)the proposed effective date of the rule.
(B)On the date of the submission of the report under subparagraph (A), the Federal agency promulgating the rule shall submit to the Comptroller General and make available to each House of Congress—
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Becker v. Federal Election Commission
230 F.3d 381 (First Circuit, 2000)
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Doucette v. Pomes
724 A.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Wash. Alliance of Tech. Workers v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland SEC.
892 F.3d 332 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
881 F.3d 75 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Robert B. Liesegang, Sr., Roberto Sotelo, and Paul L. Fletcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
312 F.3d 1368 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Kansas Natural Resource v. United States Dept of Interior
971 F.3d 1222 (Tenth Circuit, 2020)
National Association for Fixed Annuities v. United States Department of Labor
217 F. Supp. 3d 1 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Abraham
355 F.3d 179 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Earl C. McDaniels v. United States of America, Randolph F. Lovett v. United States of America, Alton E. Brown, Jr. v. United States
300 F.3d 407 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)
Citizens for Constitutional v. United States
57 F.4th 750 (Tenth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Reece
956 F. Supp. 2d 736 (W.D. Louisiana, 2013)
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Zinke
313 F. Supp. 3d 976 (D. Alaska, 2018)
Foster v. The United States Department of Agriculture
(D. South Dakota, 2022)
National Petrochemical & Refiners Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
643 F.3d 958 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Watterson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(E.D. Texas, 2024)
Daines v. Internal Revenue Service
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2025)
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. National Park Service
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §251, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 868; amended Pub. L. 118–5, div. B, title III, §270, June 3, 2023, 137 Stat. 33; Pub. L. 118–97, §2, Oct. 1, 2024, 138 Stat. 1573.)
Editorial Notes
Amendment of Subsection (a)(1)(D)
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), Oct. 1, 2024, 138 Stat. 1574, provided that, effective 6 years after Oct. 1, 2024, subsection (a)(1) of this section is amended by striking subparagraph (D). See 2024 Amendment note below.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Sections 202, 203, 204, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(B)(iii), are classified to sections 1532, 1533, 1534, and 1535, respectively, of Title 2, The Congress.
The date of the enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), (2), is the date of the enactment of Pub. L. 104–121, which was approved Mar. 29, 1996.
Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a)(1)(D). Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), struck out subpar. (D) which required Federal agencies to submit to the Comptroller General a report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made ineffective.
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(a), added subpar. (D).
2023—Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 118–5, §§268, 270, temporarily inserted ", and shall in addition include an assessment of the agency's compliance with such requirements of the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023 as may be applicable" after "compliance with procedural steps required by paragraph (1)(B)". See Termination Date of 2023 Amendment note below.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2024 Amendment
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), Oct. 1, 2024, 138 Stat. 1574, provided that the amendment made by section 2(b) is effective on the date that is 6 years after Oct. 1, 2024.
Termination Date of 2023 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 118–5 expires on Dec. 31, 2024, see section 268 of Pub. L. 118–5, set out in a Statutory Administrative Pay-As-You-Go note under section 551 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §252, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 874, provided that: "The amendment made by section 351 [probably means section 251, enacting this chapter] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 29, 1996]."
Short Title
This chapter is popularly known as the "Congressional Review Act".
Truth in Regulating
Pub. L. 106–312, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1248, as amended by Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, provided that:
"This Act may be cited as the 'Truth in Regulating Act of 2000'.
"The purposes of this Act are to—
"(1) increase the transparency of important regulatory decisions;
"(2) promote effective congressional oversight to ensure that agency rules fulfill statutory requirements in an efficient, effective, and fair manner; and
"(3) increase the accountability of Congress and the agencies to the people they serve.
"In this Act, the term—
"(1) 'agency' has the meaning given such term under section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code;
"(2) 'economically significant rule' means any proposed or final rule, including an interim or direct final rule, that may have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; and
"(3) 'independent evaluation' means a substantive evaluation of the agency's data, methodology, and assumptions used in developing the economically significant rule, including—
"(A) an explanation of how any strengths or weaknesses in those data, methodology, and assumptions support or detract from conclusions reached by the agency; and
"(B) the implications, if any, of those strengths or weaknesses for the rulemaking.
"(a) In General.—
"(1) Request for review.—When an agency publishes an economically significant rule, a chairman or ranking member of a committee of jurisdiction of either House of Congress may request the Comptroller General of the United States to review the rule.
"(2) Report.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report on each economically significant rule selected under paragraph (4) to the committees of jurisdiction in each House of Congress not later than 180 calendar days after a committee request is received. The report shall include an independent evaluation of the economically significant rule by the Comptroller General.
"(3) Independent evaluation.—The independent evaluation of the economically significant rule by the Comptroller General under paragraph (2) shall include—
"(A) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of the potential benefits of the rule, including any beneficial effects that cannot be quantified in monetary terms and the identification of the persons or entities likely to receive the benefits;
"(B) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of the potential costs of the rule, including any adverse effects that cannot be quantified in monetary terms and the identification of the persons or entities likely to bear the costs;
"(C) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of alternative approaches set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking and in the rulemaking record, as well as of any regulatory impact analysis, federalism assessment, or other analysis or assessment prepared by the agency or required for the economically significant rule; and
"(D) a summary of the results of the evaluation of the Comptroller General and the implications of those results.
"(4) Procedures for priorities of requests.—The Comptroller General shall have discretion to develop procedures for determining the priority and number of requests for review under paragraph (1) for which a report will be submitted under paragraph (2).
"(b) Authority of Comptroller General.—Each agency shall promptly cooperate with the Comptroller General in carrying out this Act. Nothing in this Act is intended to expand or limit the authority of the Government Accountability Office.
"There are authorized to be appropriated to the Government Accountability Office to carry out this Act $5,200,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2002.
"(a) Effective Date.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 2000].
"(b) Duration of Pilot Project.—The pilot project under this Act shall continue for a period of 3 years, if in each fiscal year, or portion thereof included in that period, a specific annual appropriation not less than $5,200,000 or the pro-rated equivalent thereof shall have been made for the pilot project.
"(c) Report.—Before the conclusion of the 3-year period, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report reviewing the effectiveness of the pilot project and recommending whether or not Congress should permanently authorize the pilot project."
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), Oct. 1, 2024, 138 Stat. 1574, provided that, effective 6 years after Oct. 1, 2024, subsection (a)(1) of this section is amended by striking subparagraph (D). See 2024 Amendment note below.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Sections 202, 203, 204, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(B)(iii), are classified to sections 1532, 1533, 1534, and 1535, respectively, of Title 2, The Congress.
The date of the enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), (2), is the date of the enactment of Pub. L. 104–121, which was approved Mar. 29, 1996.
Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a)(1)(D). Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), struck out subpar. (D) which required Federal agencies to submit to the Comptroller General a report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made ineffective.
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(a), added subpar. (D).
2023—Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 118–5, §§268, 270, temporarily inserted ", and shall in addition include an assessment of the agency's compliance with such requirements of the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023 as may be applicable" after "compliance with procedural steps required by paragraph (1)(B)". See Termination Date of 2023 Amendment note below.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2024 Amendment
Pub. L. 118–97, §2(b), Oct. 1, 2024, 138 Stat. 1574, provided that the amendment made by section 2(b) is effective on the date that is 6 years after Oct. 1, 2024.
Termination Date of 2023 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 118–5 expires on Dec. 31, 2024, see section 268 of Pub. L. 118–5, set out in a Statutory Administrative Pay-As-You-Go note under section 551 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §252, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 874, provided that: "The amendment made by section 351 [probably means section 251, enacting this chapter] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 29, 1996]."
Short Title
This chapter is popularly known as the "Congressional Review Act".
Truth in Regulating
Pub. L. 106–312, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1248, as amended by Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, provided that:
"This Act may be cited as the 'Truth in Regulating Act of 2000'.
"The purposes of this Act are to—
"(1) increase the transparency of important regulatory decisions;
"(2) promote effective congressional oversight to ensure that agency rules fulfill statutory requirements in an efficient, effective, and fair manner; and
"(3) increase the accountability of Congress and the agencies to the people they serve.
"In this Act, the term—
"(1) 'agency' has the meaning given such term under section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code;
"(2) 'economically significant rule' means any proposed or final rule, including an interim or direct final rule, that may have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; and
"(3) 'independent evaluation' means a substantive evaluation of the agency's data, methodology, and assumptions used in developing the economically significant rule, including—
"(A) an explanation of how any strengths or weaknesses in those data, methodology, and assumptions support or detract from conclusions reached by the agency; and
"(B) the implications, if any, of those strengths or weaknesses for the rulemaking.
"(a) In General.—
"(1) Request for review.—When an agency publishes an economically significant rule, a chairman or ranking member of a committee of jurisdiction of either House of Congress may request the Comptroller General of the United States to review the rule.
"(2) Report.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report on each economically significant rule selected under paragraph (4) to the committees of jurisdiction in each House of Congress not later than 180 calendar days after a committee request is received. The report shall include an independent evaluation of the economically significant rule by the Comptroller General.
"(3) Independent evaluation.—The independent evaluation of the economically significant rule by the Comptroller General under paragraph (2) shall include—
"(A) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of the potential benefits of the rule, including any beneficial effects that cannot be quantified in monetary terms and the identification of the persons or entities likely to receive the benefits;
"(B) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of the potential costs of the rule, including any adverse effects that cannot be quantified in monetary terms and the identification of the persons or entities likely to bear the costs;
"(C) an evaluation of the agency's analysis of alternative approaches set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking and in the rulemaking record, as well as of any regulatory impact analysis, federalism assessment, or other analysis or assessment prepared by the agency or required for the economically significant rule; and
"(D) a summary of the results of the evaluation of the Comptroller General and the implications of those results.
"(4) Procedures for priorities of requests.—The Comptroller General shall have discretion to develop procedures for determining the priority and number of requests for review under paragraph (1) for which a report will be submitted under paragraph (2).
"(b) Authority of Comptroller General.—Each agency shall promptly cooperate with the Comptroller General in carrying out this Act. Nothing in this Act is intended to expand or limit the authority of the Government Accountability Office.
"There are authorized to be appropriated to the Government Accountability Office to carry out this Act $5,200,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2002.
"(a) Effective Date.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 2000].
"(b) Duration of Pilot Project.—The pilot project under this Act shall continue for a period of 3 years, if in each fiscal year, or portion thereof included in that period, a specific annual appropriation not less than $5,200,000 or the pro-rated equivalent thereof shall have been made for the pilot project.
"(c) Report.—Before the conclusion of the 3-year period, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report reviewing the effectiveness of the pilot project and recommending whether or not Congress should permanently authorize the pilot project."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/801.