FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS

Telecommunications services for hearing-impaired and speech-impaired individuals

47 U.S.C. § 225
Title47Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
PartI

This text of 47 U.S.C. § 225 (Telecommunications services for hearing-impaired and speech-impaired individuals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 225.

Text

(a)Definitions As used in this section— The term "common carrier" or "carrier" includes any common carrier engaged in interstate communication by wire or radio as defined in section 153 of this title and any common carrier engaged in intrastate communication by wire or radio, notwithstanding sections 152(b) and 221(b) of this title. The term "TDD" means a Telecommunications Device for the Deaf, which is a machine that employs graphic communication in the transmission of coded signals through a wire or radio communication system. The term "telecommunications relay services" means telephone transmission services that provide the ability for an individual who is deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind, or who has a speech disability to engage in communication by wire or radio with one or more indi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc.
630 F.3d 1153 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
76 case citations
Sergio Rendon v. Valleycrest Productions, Ltd.
294 F.3d 1279 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
45 case citations
Lessard v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
175 F.3d 193 (First Circuit, 1999)
40 case citations
Thomas Stoutenborough v. National Football League, Inc.
59 F.3d 580 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
40 case citations
N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. United States Customs & Border Protection Bureau
563 F. Supp. 2d 217 (District of Columbia, 2008)
34 case citations
New York Ex Rel. Vacco v. Mid Hudson Medical Group, P.C.
877 F. Supp. 143 (S.D. New York, 1995)
29 case citations
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.
666 F.3d 1170 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
25 case citations
Houston v. Township of Randolph
934 F. Supp. 2d 711 (D. New Jersey, 2013)
21 case citations
Germano v. International Profit Ass'n, Inc.
544 F.3d 798 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
20 case citations
Daniel A. Crooks v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
453 F.3d 653 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
13 case citations
Sorenson Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
659 F.3d 1035 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
11 case citations
EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. District of Columbia
741 F. Supp. 2d 273 (District of Columbia, 2010)
7 case citations
Sorenson Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
765 F.3d 37 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)
6 case citations
Thomas v. Avis Rent A Car
408 F. App'x 145 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
3 case citations
GTE Arkansas, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
961 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1998)
Chambers v. State of Connecticut
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Cannady v. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Hamer v. City of Trinidad
(D. Colorado, 2020)
Simmons v. Doane
(N.D. California, 2020)

Source Credit

History

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §225, as added Pub. L. 101–336, title IV, §401(a), July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 366; amended Pub. L. 104–104, §3(d)(1), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 61; Pub. L. 111–260, title I, §103(a), Oct. 8, 2010, 124 Stat. 2755.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
2010—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 111–260 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The term 'telecommunications relay services' means telephone transmission services that provide the ability for an individual who has a hearing impairment or speech impairment to engage in communication by wire or radio with a hearing individual in a manner that is functionally equivalent to the ability of an individual who does not have a hearing impairment or speech impairment to communicate using voice communication services by wire or radio. Such term includes services that enable two-way communication between an individual who uses a TDD or other nonvoice terminal device and an individual who does not use such a device."
1996—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 104–104 substituted "section 153" for "section 153(h)".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/225.