FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 3
Unauthorized representation as practitioner
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Whoever, not being recognized to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office, holds himself out or permits himself to be held out as so recognized, or as being qualified to prepare or prosecute applications for patent, shall be fined not more than $1,000 for each offense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
35 U.S.C. § 33 (Unauthorized representation as practitioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.
339 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
340 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.
314 U.S. 84 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar
373 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1963)
General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.
304 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1938)
United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.
317 U.S. 228 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
315 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.
326 U.S. 249 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Walker
329 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
333 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
316 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1942)
United States v. Harold Lawrence Blasius
397 F.2d 203 (Second Circuit, 1968)
Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.
233 F.2d 828 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)
Stephen Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
807 F.2d 934 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.
49 F.2d 886 (Sixth Circuit, 1931)
Inre: Packard
751 F.3d 1307 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
Johanna Kipperman v. Academy Life Insurance Company
554 F.2d 377 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Application of Arbeit
206 F.2d 947 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Standard Oil Co. of California v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
154 F.2d 579 (Third Circuit, 1946)
Doran Coffee Roasting Co., Inc. v. Wyott Manufacturing Co., Inc.
267 F.2d 200 (Tenth Circuit, 1959)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 796; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §11a (May 9, 1938, ch. 188, 52 Stat. 342).
This is a criminal statute. The language has been considerably simplified and the upper limit of the penalty is increased.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1991—Pub. L. 102–204, §5(d)(2)(B), (C), Dec. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 1640, inserted "; FUNDING; SEARCH SYSTEMS" after "FEES" in chapter heading, inserted "; patent and trademark search systems" after "fees" in item 41, and substituted "Patent and Trademark Office funding" for "Payment of patent fees; return of excess amounts" in item 42.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §11a (May 9, 1938, ch. 188, 52 Stat. 342).
This is a criminal statute. The language has been considerably simplified and the upper limit of the penalty is increased.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1991—Pub. L. 102–204, §5(d)(2)(B), (C), Dec. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 1640, inserted "; FUNDING; SEARCH SYSTEMS" after "FEES" in chapter heading, inserted "; patent and trademark search systems" after "fees" in item 41, and substituted "Patent and Trademark Office funding" for "Payment of patent fees; return of excess amounts" in item 42.