FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Liability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials for infringement of patents

35 U.S.C. § 296
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 296 (Liability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials for infringement of patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 296.

Text

(a)In General.—Any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his official capacity, shall not be immune, under the eleventh amendment of the Constitution of the United States or under any other doctrine of sovereign immunity, from suit in Federal court by any person, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for infringement of a patent under section 271, or for any other violation under this title.
(b)Remedies.—In a suit described in subsection (a) for a violation described in that subsection, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for the violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in a suit against any private entity. Such remedies

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
527 U.S. 627 (Supreme Court, 1999)
434 case citations
Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv.
587 U.S. 618 (Supreme Court, 2019)
60 case citations
Rodriguez v. Texas Commission on the Arts
199 F.3d 279 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
40 case citations
Alaska v. EEOC
564 F.3d 1062 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
36 case citations
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
948 F. Supp. 400 (D. New Jersey, 1996)
24 case citations
Jacobs v. MEMPHIS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU
710 F. Supp. 2d 663 (W.D. Tennessee, 2010)
8 case citations
Ward Ex Rel. Ward v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services
72 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (D. New Mexico, 1999)
7 case citations
Bradley v. Arkansas Department of Education
189 F.3d 745 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
7 case citations
Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California
939 F. Supp. 639 (S.D. Indiana, 1996)
6 case citations
Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California
143 F.3d 1446 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
4 case citations
Barbour, Adam v. WMATA
(D.C. Circuit, 2004)
1 case citations
State of Alaska v. Eeoc
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Nissen v. POTUS
(D. New Mexico, 2023)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 102–560, §2(a)(2), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4230.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Constitutionality
For information regarding the constitutionality of this section, as added by section 2(a)(2) of Pub. L. 102–560, see the Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court on the Constitution Annotated website, constitution.congress.gov.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective with respect to violations that occur on or after Oct. 28, 1992, see section 4 of Pub. L. 102–560, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 2541 of Title 7, Agriculture.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/296.