FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Attorney fees
35 U.S.C. § 285
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 285 (Attorney fees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 285.
Text
The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.
386 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Embrex, Inc. v. Service Engineering Corp. And Edward G. Bounds, Jr.
216 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.
153 F.3d 1318 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp.
466 F.3d 1000 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary, St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary
552 F.2d 309 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Vardon Golf Co. v. Karsten Manufacturing Corp.
213 F.R.D. 528 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Invamed Inc.
213 F.3d 1359 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Amerik Supplies, Inc.
850 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (N.D. Georgia, 2012)
General Motors Corporation v. Toyota Motor Company, Ltd.
667 F.2d 504 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)
Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, Inc.
230 F.2d 855 (Fourth Circuit, 1956)
Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter AB
703 F. Supp. 408 (D. Maryland, 1988)
E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3Com Corp.
559 F.3d 1374 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Gambro Lundia AB v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
896 F. Supp. 1522 (D. Colorado, 1995)
Norfin, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.
81 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colorado, 1979)
Olson Kundig Inc v. 12th Avenue Iron Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
WSOU Investments LLC v. F5 Networks Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Studio 010 Inc v. Digital Cashflow LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Plastic Development Group LLC v. Yita LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James Klein
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section is substantially the same as the corresponding provision in R.S. 4921; "in exceptional cases" has been added as expressing the intention of the present statute as shown by its legislative history and as interpreted by the courts.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section is substantially the same as the corresponding provision in R.S. 4921; "in exceptional cases" has been added as expressing the intention of the present statute as shown by its legislative history and as interpreted by the courts.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/285.