FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Damages
35 U.S.C. § 284
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 284 (Damages) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 284.
Text
Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court.
When the damages are not found by a jury, the court shall assess them. In either event the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed. Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d).
The court may receive expert testimony as an aid to the determination of damages or of what royalty would be reasonable under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ddr Holdings, LLC v. hotels.com, L.P.
773 F.3d 1245 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.
406 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson v. Bridgewood Services, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
290 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Ab
383 F.3d 1337 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Embrex, Inc. v. Service Engineering Corp. And Edward G. Bounds, Jr.
216 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation, Defendant-Cross
363 F.3d 1321 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp.
466 F.3d 1000 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.
195 F.R.D. 618 (N.D. Illinois, 2000)
Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Remington Records, Inc.
265 F.2d 263 (Second Circuit, 1959)
Transmatic, Inc. v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
180 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 1999)
Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.
202 F.R.D. 418 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2001)
Bros Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.
320 F.2d 594 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Grossman
312 F.2d 293 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.
946 F. Supp. 2d 449 (E.D. Virginia, 2013)
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. Ottawa Plant Food, Inc.
219 F.R.D. 135 (N.D. Iowa, 2003)
SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
940 F. Supp. 2d 480 (E.D. Texas, 2013)
Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter AB
703 F. Supp. 408 (D. Maryland, 1988)
Minco, Inc. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
903 F. Supp. 1204 (E.D. Tennessee, 1995)
Norfin, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.
81 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colorado, 1979)
K.W. Muth Co. v. Bing-Lear Mfg. Group, L.L.C.
219 F.R.D. 554 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4507(9)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–566; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§67 and 70, part (R.S. 4919; R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section consolidates the provisions relating to damages in R.S. 4919 and 4921, with some changes in language.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Second par. Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "154(d)".
1999—Second par. Pub. L. 106–113 inserted at end "Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d) of this title."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4508] of Pub. L. 106–113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§67 and 70, part (R.S. 4919; R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section consolidates the provisions relating to damages in R.S. 4919 and 4921, with some changes in language.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Second par. Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "154(d)".
1999—Second par. Pub. L. 106–113 inserted at end "Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d) of this title."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4508] of Pub. L. 106–113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/284.