FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Additional remedy for infringement of design patent
35 U.S.C. § 289
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 289 (Additional remedy for infringement of design patent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 289.
Text
Whoever during the term of a patent for a design, without license of the owner, (1) applies the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof, to any article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, or (2) sells or exposes for sale any article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been applied shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit, but not less than $250, recoverable in any United States district court having jurisdiction of the parties.
Nothing in this section shall prevent, lessen, or impeach any other remedy which an owner of an infringed patent has under the provisions of this title, but he shall not twice recover the profit made from the infringement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of America
975 F.2d 815 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Trans-World Manufacturing Corp., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Al Nyman & Sons, Inc., and Al-Site Corporation, Appellants/cross-Appellees
750 F.2d 1552 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.
138 F.3d 1437 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp.
466 F.3d 1000 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Signode Corporation v. Weld-Loc Systems, Inc. And Strapex Ag
700 F.2d 1108 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.
195 F.R.D. 618 (N.D. Illinois, 2000)
Schnadig Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Company, Inc.
620 F.2d 1166 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
Arminak & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.
501 F.3d 1314 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.
243 F. Supp. 500 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc.
372 F. Supp. 88 (E.D. New York, 1974)
Green Valley Products, Inc. v. Sterwood Corp.
308 F. Supp. 700 (E.D. New York, 1969)
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
678 F. App'x 1012 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Nordock, Inc. v. Systems Inc.
681 F. App'x 965 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
PUMA SE v. Brooks Sports Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Peleg Design Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
(S.D. Florida, 2024)
XYZ CORPORATION v. THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
(S.D. Florida, 2024)
Abc Corporation I v. Partnership and Unincorporated Associations
(Federal Circuit, 2022)
Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd. (In re AI Realty Marketing of New York, Inc.)
304 B.R. 622 (S.D. New York, 2004)
GAIATOP LLC v. SHENZHEN JISU KEJI YOUXIANGONGSI
(D. New Jersey, 2025)
John Charles Designs, Inc. v. Queen International Design, Inc.
940 F. Supp. 1516 (C.D. California, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§74, 75 (Feb. 4, 1887, ch. 105, §§1, 2, 24 Stat. 387, 388).
Language is changed.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§74, 75 (Feb. 4, 1887, ch. 105, §§1, 2, 24 Stat. 387, 388).
Language is changed.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/289.