FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Derived patents

35 U.S.C. § 291
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 291 (Derived patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 291.

Text

(a)In General.—The owner of a patent may have relief by civil action against the owner of another patent that claims the same invention and has an earlier effective filing date, if the invention claimed in such other patent was derived from the inventor of the invention claimed in the patent owned by the person seeking relief under this section.
(b)Filing Limitation.—An action under this section may be filed only before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the issuance of the first patent containing a claim to the allegedly derived invention and naming an individual alleged to have derived such invention as the inventor or joint inventor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-Cross
376 F.3d 1352 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
202 case citations
Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.
747 F.2d 1422 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
134 case citations
Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.
437 F.3d 1157 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
125 case citations
Creative Compounds, LLC v. Starmark Laboratories
651 F.3d 1303 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
54 case citations
Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.
655 F.3d 1291 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
53 case citations
Advance Transformer Co. v. Melvin L. Levinson
837 F.2d 1081 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
46 case citations
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.
61 F.R.D. 24 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
45 case citations
Richard D. Albert v. Kevex Corporation, Richard D. Albert v. Kevex Corporation
729 F.2d 757 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
43 case citations
Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
73 F.R.D. 16 (D. Delaware, 1976)
31 case citations
Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. v. Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
989 F. Supp. 265 (District of Columbia, 1998)
24 case citations
Diamond International Corporation v. Walterhoefer
289 F. Supp. 550 (D. Maryland, 1968)
20 case citations
General Motors Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.
123 F. Supp. 506 (N.D. Indiana, 1954)
9 case citations
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Continental Group, Inc.
525 F. Supp. 950 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
8 case citations
Secure Axcess, LLC v. Pnc Bank National Association
848 F.3d 1370 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
6 case citations
BALLY GAMING, INC. v. Kappos
789 F. Supp. 2d 41 (District of Columbia, 2011)
6 case citations
In Re Joseph W. Keil
808 F.2d 830 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
5 case citations

Source Credit

History

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 112–29, §§3(h)(1), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 288, 335.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §66 (R.S. 4918, amended Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §12, 44 Stat. 1337).
Language is changed.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "146".
Pub. L. 112–29, §3(h)(1), amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The owner of an interfering patent may have relief against the owner of another by civil action, and the court may adjudge the question of the validity of any of the interfering patents, in whole or in part. The provisions of the second paragraph of section 146 shall apply to actions brought under this section."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by section 3(h)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title.
Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Savings Provisions
Provisions of 35 U.S.C. 291, as in effect on the day before the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, apply to each claim of certain applications for patent, and certain patents issued thereon, for which the amendments made by section 3 of Pub. L. 112–29 also apply, see section 3(n)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/291.