FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 25
Effect of reissue
35 U.S.C. § 252
Title35 — Patents
Chapter25 — AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION OF PATENTS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 252 (Effect of reissue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 252.
Text
The surrender of the original patent shall take effect upon the issue of the reissued patent, and every reissued patent shall have the same effect and operation in law, on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising, as if the same had been originally granted in such amended form, but in so far as the claims of the original and reissued patents are substantially identical, such surrender shall not affect any action then pending nor abate any cause of action then existing, and the reissued patent, to the extent that its claims are substantially identical with the original patent, shall constitute a continuation thereof and have effect continuously from the date of the original patent.
A reissued patent shall not abridge or affect the right of any person or that person's successors in
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman Gunther
717 F.2d 1380 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. Rennels
731 F.2d 818 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
721 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.
563 F.3d 1358 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Plastic Container Corporation v. Continental Plastics of Oklahoma, Inc.
607 F.2d 885 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF, Inc.
782 F.2d 995 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Akron Brass Company v. Elkhart Brass Manufacturing Co., Inc.
353 F.2d 704 (Seventh Circuit, 1965)
George K. Austin, Jr. v. Marco Dental Products, Inc.
560 F.2d 966 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Panduit Corporation v. Burndy Corporation and Burndy Midwest, Inc.
517 F.2d 535 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Kenall Mfg. Co. v. Cooper Lighting, LLC
354 F. Supp. 3d 877 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Wallace A. Erickson & Co.
627 F.2d 57 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
John W. England v. Deere & Company
284 F.2d 460 (Seventh Circuit, 1961)
Wayne-Gossard Corporation v. Moretz Hosiery Mills, Inc.
539 F.2d 986 (Fourth Circuit, 1976)
In Re Tanaka
640 F.3d 1246 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
American Cyanamid Company v. Lincoln Laboratories, Inc.
403 F.2d 486 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
Ethicon Endo-Surgery v. United States Surgical Corp.
900 F. Supp. 172 (S.D. Ohio, 1995)
Dow Corning Corp. v. General Electric Co.
461 F. Supp. 519 (N.D. New York, 1978)
Dey, Inc. v. Sepracor, Inc.
847 F. Supp. 2d 541 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
722 F. Supp. 592 (N.D. California, 1988)
ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.
989 F. Supp. 2d 364 (D. Delaware, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §533(b)(2), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4989; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4507(8)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–566.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §64 (R.S. 4916, amended May 24, 1928, ch. 730, 45 Stat. 732.)
The first paragraph follows the present section with some rearrangement in language. The second paragraph adds new provisions for the protection of intervening rights, the court is given discretion to protect legitimate activities which would be adversely affected by the grant of a reissue and things made before the grant of the reissue are not subject to the reissue unless a claim of the original patent which is repeated in the reissue is infringed.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 inserted "substantially" before "identical" in two places in first par.
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 amended second par. generally. Prior to amendment, second par. read as follows: "No reissued patent shall abridge or affect the right of any person or his successors in business who made, purchased or used prior to the grant of a reissue anything patented by the reissued patent, to continue the use of, or to sell to others to be used or sold, the specific thing so made, purchased or used, unless the making, using or selling of such thing infringes a valid claim of the reissued patent which was in the original patent. The court before which such matter is in question may provide for the continued manufacture, use or sale of the thing made, purchased or used as specified, or for the manufacture, use or sale of which substantial preparation was made before the grant of the reissue, and it may also provide for the continued practice of any process patented by the reissue, practice, or for the practice of which substantial preparation was made, prior to the grant of the reissue, to the extent and under such terms as the court deems equitable for the protection of investments made or business commenced before the grant of the reissue."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4508] of Pub. L. 106–113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §64 (R.S. 4916, amended May 24, 1928, ch. 730, 45 Stat. 732.)
The first paragraph follows the present section with some rearrangement in language. The second paragraph adds new provisions for the protection of intervening rights, the court is given discretion to protect legitimate activities which would be adversely affected by the grant of a reissue and things made before the grant of the reissue are not subject to the reissue unless a claim of the original patent which is repeated in the reissue is infringed.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 inserted "substantially" before "identical" in two places in first par.
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 amended second par. generally. Prior to amendment, second par. read as follows: "No reissued patent shall abridge or affect the right of any person or his successors in business who made, purchased or used prior to the grant of a reissue anything patented by the reissued patent, to continue the use of, or to sell to others to be used or sold, the specific thing so made, purchased or used, unless the making, using or selling of such thing infringes a valid claim of the reissued patent which was in the original patent. The court before which such matter is in question may provide for the continued manufacture, use or sale of the thing made, purchased or used as specified, or for the manufacture, use or sale of which substantial preparation was made before the grant of the reissue, and it may also provide for the continued practice of any process patented by the reissue, practice, or for the practice of which substantial preparation was made, prior to the grant of the reissue, to the extent and under such terms as the court deems equitable for the protection of investments made or business commenced before the grant of the reissue."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4508] of Pub. L. 106–113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/252.