FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Time for prosecuting application
35 U.S.C. § 133
Title35 — Patents
Chapter12 — EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 133 (Time for prosecuting application) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 133.
Text
Upon failure of the applicant to prosecute the application within six months after any action therein, of which notice has been given or mailed to the applicant, or within such shorter time, not less than thirty days, as fixed by the Director in such action, the application shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Stephen B. Bogese II
303 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology & IGT
543 F.3d 657 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
Acme Highway Products Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. The D. S. Brown Company and Delmont D. Brown, Cross-Appellants
431 F.2d 1074 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
Rydeen v. Quigg
748 F. Supp. 900 (District of Columbia, 1990)
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. PepsiCo, Inc.
160 F. Supp. 3d 553 (S.D. New York, 2016)
Shila Morganroth v. Donald J. Quigg, Honorable, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
885 F.2d 843 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.
558 F. Supp. 747 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
Mary Helen Sears v. Robert Gottschalk, Commissioner of Patents
502 F.2d 122 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
Margolis v. Banner
599 F.2d 435 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1979)
Jerold B. Smith and the Cardinal Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
671 F.2d 533 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents v. Robert J. Ebbert and Design Products Corporation
398 F.2d 762 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
704 F.2d 1319 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
529 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Massachusetts, 2007)
Chesapeake Fiber Packaging Corp. v. Sebro Packaging Corp.
143 B.R. 360 (D. Maryland, 1992)
The American Gage & Manufacturing Company and Alfred A. Anglemyer v. Felber Maasdam, D.B.A. Maasdam Pow'r Pull
245 F.2d 62 (Sixth Circuit, 1957)
Albert Lorenz v. Charles W. Finkl
333 F.2d 885 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1964)
Radio Corp. of America v. International Standard Electric Corp.
134 F. Supp. 593 (D. Delaware, 1955)
Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC
987 F. Supp. 2d 504 (D. Delaware, 2013)
DH Technology, Inc. v. Synergystex International, Inc.
937 F. Supp. 902 (N.D. California, 1996)
Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Lee
216 F. Supp. 3d 680 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–211, title II, §202(b)(5), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1536.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §37 (R.S. 4894, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §4, 29 Stat. 692, 693, (2) July 6, 1916, ch. 225, §1, 39 Stat. 345, 347–8, (3) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §1, 44 Stat. 1335, (4) Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 568, 53 Stat. 1264).
The opening clause of the corresponding section of existing statute is omitted as having no present day meaning or value and the last two sentences are omitted for inclusion in section 267. The notice is stated as given or mailed. Language is revised.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2012—Pub. L. 112–211 struck out ", unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Director that such delay was unavoidable" before period at end.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2012 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, applicable to patents issued before, on, or after that effective date and patent applications pending on or filed after that effective date, and not effective with respect to patents in litigation commenced before that effective date, see section 203 of Pub. L. 112–211, set out as an Effective Date note under section 27 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §37 (R.S. 4894, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §4, 29 Stat. 692, 693, (2) July 6, 1916, ch. 225, §1, 39 Stat. 345, 347–8, (3) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, §1, 44 Stat. 1335, (4) Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 568, 53 Stat. 1264).
The opening clause of the corresponding section of existing statute is omitted as having no present day meaning or value and the last two sentences are omitted for inclusion in section 267. The notice is stated as given or mailed. Language is revised.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2012—Pub. L. 112–211 struck out ", unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Director that such delay was unavoidable" before period at end.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2012 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, applicable to patents issued before, on, or after that effective date and patent applications pending on or filed after that effective date, and not effective with respect to patents in litigation commenced before that effective date, see section 203 of Pub. L. 112–211, set out as an Effective Date note under section 27 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/133.