FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V—PROCUREMENT PROTEST SYSTEM
Nonexclusivity of remedies; matters included in agency record
31 U.S.C. § 3556
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER V—PROCUREMENT PROTEST SYSTEM
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 3556 (Nonexclusivity of remedies; matters included in agency record) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 3556.
Text
This subchapter does not give the Comptroller General exclusive jurisdiction over protests, and nothing contained in this subchapter shall affect the right of any interested party to file a protest with the contracting agency or to file an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims. In any such action based on a procurement or proposed procurement with respect to which a protest has been filed under this subchapter, the reports required by sections 3553(b)(2) and 3554(e)(1) of this title with respect to such procurement or proposed procurement and any decision or recommendation of the Comptroller General under this subchapter with respect to such procurement or proposed procurement shall be considered to be part of the agency record subject to review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.
870 F.2d 644 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Glenn Defense Marine (Asia), PTE Ltd. v. United States
720 F.3d 901 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Delta Data Systems Corporation v. William H. Webster, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and System Development Corporation, (Two Cases)
744 F.2d 197 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,044 (Federal Claims, 1997)
Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 806 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Crassociates, Inc. v. United States
95 Fed. Cl. 357 (Federal Claims, 2010)
Mike Hooks, Inc. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,191 (Federal Claims, 1997)
Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 81 (Federal Claims, 2011)
District of Columbia v. Group Insurance Administration
633 A.2d 2 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
East West, Inc. v. United States
100 Fed. Cl. 53 (Federal Claims, 2011)
Centech Group, Inc. v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 496 (Federal Claims, 2007)
Diebold v. United States
947 F.2d 787 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)
Maritime Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. United States
242 F.3d 1326 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United States
117 Fed. Cl. 137 (Federal Claims, 2014)
Biospherics, Inc. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 1 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Proxtronics Dosimetry, LLC v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 656 (Federal Claims, 2016)
IMS Services, Inc. v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,784 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. v. United States
118 Fed. Cl. 237 (Federal Claims, 2014)
S.K.J. & Associates, Inc. v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 218 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Advanced American Construction, Inc. v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 205 (Federal Claims, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2741(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1202; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 104–320, §12(f), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3876.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–320, which directed the amendment of this section by striking "a court of the United States or" in first sentence, was executed by striking "a district court of the United States or" after "to file an action in" in first sentence to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–320 effective Jan. 1, 2001, see section 12(f) of Pub. L. 104–320, set out as a Nonexclusivity of GAO Remedies note below.
Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to any protest filed after Jan. 14, 1985, see section 2751(b) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 4751 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Nonexclusivity of GAO Remedies
Pub. L. 104–320, §12(f), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3876, provided that: "In the event that the bid protest jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States is terminated pursuant to subsection (d) [set out as a Sunset Provision note under section 1491 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure], then section 3556 of title 31, United States Code, shall be amended by striking 'a court of the United States or' in the first sentence." [Bid protest jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States terminated on Jan. 1, 2001, pursuant to section 12(d) of Pub. L. 104–320.]
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–320, which directed the amendment of this section by striking "a court of the United States or" in first sentence, was executed by striking "a district court of the United States or" after "to file an action in" in first sentence to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–320 effective Jan. 1, 2001, see section 12(f) of Pub. L. 104–320, set out as a Nonexclusivity of GAO Remedies note below.
Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to any protest filed after Jan. 14, 1985, see section 2751(b) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 4751 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Nonexclusivity of GAO Remedies
Pub. L. 104–320, §12(f), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3876, provided that: "In the event that the bid protest jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States is terminated pursuant to subsection (d) [set out as a Sunset Provision note under section 1491 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure], then section 3556 of title 31, United States Code, shall be amended by striking 'a court of the United States or' in the first sentence." [Bid protest jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States terminated on Jan. 1, 2001, pursuant to section 12(d) of Pub. L. 104–320.]
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 3556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/3556.