FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Rules and regulations; exemptions
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
In accordance with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission may issue such rules and regulations as it may consider necessary or appropriate for carrying out this chapter, and may establish such reasonable exemptions to and from any or all provisions of this chapter as it may find necessary and proper in the public interest.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 U.S.C. § 628 (Rules and regulations; exemptions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
528 U.S. 62 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Smith v. City of Jackson
544 U.S. 228 (Supreme Court, 2005)
LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINK
517 U.S. 882 (Supreme Court, 1996)
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
540 U.S. 581 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, Appellants
170 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 1999)
Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.
426 F.3d 1304 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities and University Professionals of Illinois
957 F.2d 424 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
Tina Grant v. City of Blytheville, Arkansas
841 F.3d 767 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
George L. CHARLIER and George B. Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC., Defendant-Appellee
556 F.2d 761 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
John Miller, Jr. v. Hillary Clinton
687 F.3d 1332 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. Eiszner
877 F.2d 221 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Fried v. LVI Services, Inc.
500 F. App'x 39 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Carolyn Burlison v. McDonald's Corporation
455 F.3d 1242 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Tharon Paup v. Gear Products, Inc.
327 F. App'x 100 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
D. Archie Hale v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
503 F. App'x 323 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Mastie v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.
424 F. Supp. 1299 (E.D. Michigan, 1976)
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; Orange County Retirement Board, Defendants-Appellees
837 F.2d 420 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Romero v. Allstate Insurance
1 F. Supp. 3d 319 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)
Heck v. Board of Trustees, Kenyon College
12 F. Supp. 2d 728 (S.D. Ohio, 1998)
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
461 F.3d 134 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 90–202, §9, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 605; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary of Labor" and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.
Transfer of Functions
"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary of Labor" and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.