FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Encouragement of more generous leave policies
29 U.S.C. § 2653
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2653 (Encouragement of more generous leave policies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2653.
Text
Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act shall be construed to discourage employers from adopting or retaining leave policies more generous than any policies that comply with the requirements under this Act or any amendment made by this Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McGregor Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Cox v. AutoZone, Inc.
180 F.3d 1305 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Martin Allen v. Butler County Commissioners
331 F. App'x 389 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Thurston v. Cherry Hill Triplex
941 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. New Jersey, 2008)
Santosuosso v. NovaCare Rehabilitation
462 F. Supp. 2d 590 (D. New Jersey, 2006)
Eleanor Lafata v. Church of Christ Home for the
325 F. App'x 416 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Campbell v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.
812 F. Supp. 2d 748 (E.D. Virginia, 2011)
Barron v. Runyon
11 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. Virginia, 1998)
Miller v. Personal-Touch of Virginia, Inc.
342 F. Supp. 2d 499 (E.D. Virginia, 2004)
Joan Sherfel v. Reggie Newson
768 F.3d 561 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Highlands Hospital Corp. v. Preece
323 S.W.3d 357 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2010)
Weidner v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.
606 F. Supp. 2d 949 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2009)
Garrett v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
338 F. Supp. 2d 717 (N.D. Texas, 2004)
Cox v. Autozone, Inc.
990 F. Supp. 1369 (M.D. Alabama, 1998)
Covey v. Methodist Hospital of Dyersburg, Inc.
56 F. Supp. 2d 965 (W.D. Tennessee, 1999)
Smith v. Medpointe Healthcare, Inc.
338 F. App'x 230 (Third Circuit, 2009)
Santos v. Shields Health Group
996 F. Supp. 87 (D. Massachusetts, 1998)
Fleece v. BFS DIVERSIFIED, LLC
618 F. Supp. 2d 929 (S.D. Indiana, 2008)
Bernard v. EDS Noland Episcopal Day School
62 F. Supp. 3d 535 (W.D. Louisiana, 2014)
In Re Tp. of Parsippany-Troy Hills
17 A.3d 834 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Ruder v. MaineGeneral Medical Center
204 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D. Maine, 2002)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–3, title IV, §403, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 26.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–3, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 6, known as the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which enacted this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, amended section 2105 of Title 5, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 2601 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of this title and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
References in Text
This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–3, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 6, known as the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which enacted this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, amended section 2105 of Title 5, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 2601 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of this title and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2653.