FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAVE
Prohibited acts
29 U.S.C. § 2615
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (Prohibited acts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2615.
Text
(a)Interference with rights
It shall be unlawful for any employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, any right provided under this subchapter.
It shall be unlawful for any employer to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual for opposing any practice made unlawful by this subchapter.
(b)Interference with proceedings or inquiries
It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual because such individual—
(1)has filed any charge, or has instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding, under or related to this subchapter;
(2)has given, or is about to give, any information in connection with any inquiry or proceeding relating to any right provided under th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Graziadio v. Culinary Institute of America
817 F.3d 415 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Strickland v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
555 F.3d 1224 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Roller v. Riley Riper Hollin & Colagreco
850 F. Supp. 2d 502 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Ainsworth v. Loudon County School Board
851 F. Supp. 2d 963 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency
642 F.3d 753 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Cooper v. New York State Nurses Ass'n
847 F. Supp. 2d 437 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque
849 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. New Mexico, 2011)
Villegas v. Albertsons, LLC
96 F. Supp. 3d 624 (W.D. Texas, 2015)
Ronald Law v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.
651 F. App'x 645 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Smith v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
46 V.I. 466 (Virgin Islands, 2005)
Nihal Menekse v. Harrahs Chester Casino & Racet
649 F. App'x 142 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Williams v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.
851 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Smith v. Clover Park School District No 400
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Anstead v. Virginia Mason Medical Center
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Spokoiny v. University of Washington Medical Center
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Ngo v. DeJoy
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Thomas v. City of Green Bay
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2022)
Sterling v. Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas
(E.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Brown, Lori v. Green County
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2022)
Kuether v. Posley
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–3, title I, §105, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 14.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2615.