FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 28
Prohibited acts
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Interference with rights
(1)Exercise of rights
It shall be unlawful for any employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, any right provided under this subchapter.
(2)Discrimination
It shall be unlawful for any employer to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual for opposing any practice made unlawful by this subchapter.
(b)Interference with proceedings or inquiries
It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual because such individual—
(1)has filed any charge, or has instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding, under or related to this subchapter;
(2)has given, or is about to give, any information in connection with any inquiry or proceedi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 U.S.C. § 2615 (Prohibited acts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graziadio v. Culinary Institute of America
817 F.3d 415 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Strickland v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
555 F.3d 1224 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Roller v. Riley Riper Hollin & Colagreco
850 F. Supp. 2d 502 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Ainsworth v. Loudon County School Board
851 F. Supp. 2d 963 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency
642 F.3d 753 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Cooper v. New York State Nurses Ass'n
847 F. Supp. 2d 437 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque
849 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. New Mexico, 2011)
Villegas v. Albertsons, LLC
96 F. Supp. 3d 624 (W.D. Texas, 2015)
Ronald Law v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.
651 F. App'x 645 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Smith v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
46 V.I. 466 (Virgin Islands, 2005)
Nihal Menekse v. Harrahs Chester Casino & Racet
649 F. App'x 142 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Williams v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.
851 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Smith v. Clover Park School District No 400
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Anstead v. Virginia Mason Medical Center
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Spokoiny v. University of Washington Medical Center
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Ngo v. DeJoy
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Thomas v. City of Green Bay
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2022)
Sterling v. Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas
(E.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Brown, Lori v. Green County
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2022)
Kuether v. Posley
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–3, title I, §105, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 14.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.