FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 8
Relation to other laws
29 U.S.C. § 218
Title29 — Labor
Chapter8 — FAIR LABOR STANDARDS
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 218 (Relation to other laws) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 218.
Text
(a)No provision of this chapter or of any order thereunder shall excuse noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a minimum wage higher than the minimum wage established under this chapter or a maximum work week lower than the maximum workweek established under this chapter, and no provision of this chapter relating to the employment of child labor shall justify noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a higher standard than the standard established under this chapter. No provision of this chapter shall justify any employer in reducing a wage paid by him which is in excess of the applicable minimum wage under this chapter, or justify any employer in increasing hours of employment maintained by him which are short
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.
339 U.S. 497 (Supreme Court, 1950)
United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert Klinghoffer
285 F.2d 487 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Bureerong v. Uvawas
922 F. Supp. 1450 (C.D. California, 1996)
Wade v. Carter, Jr. v. Panama Canal Company
463 F.2d 1289 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.
13 F.3d 685 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
564 F. Supp. 2d 870 (N.D. Iowa, 2008)
Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, C.O., Fort Buchanan
826 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1987)
Aguilar v. Association for Retarded Citizens
234 Cal. App. 3d 21 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)
Colson v. Avnet, Inc.
687 F. Supp. 2d 914 (D. Arizona, 2010)
Pettis Moving Co., Inc. v. Lillian Roberts, Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York
784 F.2d 439 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Gurung v. Malhotra
851 F. Supp. 2d 583 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Frank Bros., Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Frank Busalacchi, Secretary, and Marilyn Kuick, Chief Eeo/labor Compliance
409 F.3d 880 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Overnite Transportation Co. v. Betty L. Tianti, Commissioner of Labor of the State of Connecticut
926 F.2d 220 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry
958 A.2d 1050 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Harris v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc.
41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
Doctors Hospital, Inc. v. Luis Silva Recio, Secretary of Labor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
558 F.2d 619 (First Circuit, 1977)
Dancer v. Golden Coin, Ltd.
176 P.3d 271 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2008)
Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry
709 F. Supp. 1516 (C.D. California, 1989)
Davenport Taxi, Inc. v. State Labor Commissioner
319 A.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1973)
Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc.
997 F. Supp. 196 (D. Puerto Rico, 1998)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1938, ch. 676, §18, 52 Stat. 1069; Pub. L. 89–601, title III, §306, Sept. 23, 1966, 80 Stat. 841; Pub. L. 90–83, §8, Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 222.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
For definition of Canal Zone, referred to in subsec. (b), see section 3602(b) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
Amendments
1967—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–83 substituted reference to section 5102(c)(7) of title 5 for reference to par. (7) of section 202 of the Classification Act of 1949 to reflect the amendment of section 5341(a) of title 5 by section 1(97) of Pub. L. 90–83 and struck out provision covering employees described in section 7474 of title 10 in view of the repeal of section 7474 of title 10 by Pub. L. 89–554.
1966—Pub. L. 89–601 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 89–601 effective Feb. 1, 1967, except as otherwise provided, see section 602 of Pub. L. 89–601, set out as a note under section 203 of this title.
Rules, Regulations, and Orders Promulgated With Regard to 1966 Amendments
Secretary authorized to promulgate necessary rules, regulations, or orders on and after the date of the enactment of Pub. L. 89–601, Sept. 23, 1966, with regard to the amendments made by Pub. L. 89–601, see section 602 of Pub. L. 89–601, set out as a note under section 203 of this title.
References in Text
For definition of Canal Zone, referred to in subsec. (b), see section 3602(b) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
Amendments
1967—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–83 substituted reference to section 5102(c)(7) of title 5 for reference to par. (7) of section 202 of the Classification Act of 1949 to reflect the amendment of section 5341(a) of title 5 by section 1(97) of Pub. L. 90–83 and struck out provision covering employees described in section 7474 of title 10 in view of the repeal of section 7474 of title 10 by Pub. L. 89–554.
1966—Pub. L. 89–601 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 89–601 effective Feb. 1, 1967, except as otherwise provided, see section 602 of Pub. L. 89–601, set out as a note under section 203 of this title.
Rules, Regulations, and Orders Promulgated With Regard to 1966 Amendments
Secretary authorized to promulgate necessary rules, regulations, or orders on and after the date of the enactment of Pub. L. 89–601, Sept. 23, 1966, with regard to the amendments made by Pub. L. 89–601, see section 602 of Pub. L. 89–601, set out as a note under section 203 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/218.