FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 20

Applicability of chapter

29 U.S.C. § 1803
Title29Labor
SubtitleF
Chapter20 — MIGRANT AND SEASONAL AGRICULTURAL WORKER PROTECTION

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1803 (Applicability of chapter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1803.

Text

(a)The following persons are not subject to this chapter:
(1)Family business exemption.—Any individual who engages in a farm labor contracting activity on behalf of a farm, processing establishment, seed conditioning establishment, cannery, gin, packing shed, or nursery, which is owned or operated exclusively by such individual or an immediate family member of such individual, if such activities are performed only for such operation and exclusively by such individual or an immediate family member, but without regard to whether such individual has incorporated or otherwise organized for business purposes.
(2)Small business exemption.—Any person, other than a farm labor contractor, for whom the man-days exemption for agricultural labor provided under section 13(a)(6)(A) of the Fair Labor

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malacara v. Garber
353 F.3d 393 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
734 case citations
Bueno v. Mattner
829 F.2d 1380 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
37 case citations
Mendoza v. Wight Vineyard Management
783 F.2d 941 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
24 case citations
Bueno v. Mattner
633 F. Supp. 1446 (W.D. Michigan, 1986)
14 case citations
Aviles v. Kunkle
765 F. Supp. 358 (S.D. Texas, 1991)
14 case citations
Jose Flores v. Reyes Rios and Gibsonburg Canning Company
36 F.3d 507 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
11 case citations
Garth Conlan v. United States Department of Labor
76 F.3d 271 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
11 case citations
Elizondo v. Podgorniak
70 F. Supp. 2d 758 (E.D. Michigan, 1999)
6 case citations
Charles v. Burton
857 F. Supp. 1574 (M.D. Georgia, 1994)
6 case citations
Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
372 F. Supp. 2d 91 (District of Columbia, 2005)
5 case citations
Soto v. McLean
20 F. Supp. 2d 901 (E.D. North Carolina, 1998)
4 case citations
Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 2d 670 (W.D. Texas, 1999)
3 case citations
Martinez v. Hauch
838 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. Michigan, 1993)
3 case citations
Calderon v. Witvoet
764 F. Supp. 536 (C.D. Illinois, 1991)
3 case citations
Fanette v. Steven Davis Farms, LLC
28 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (N.D. Florida, 2014)
3 case citations
In Re Sunarhauserman, Inc.
184 B.R. 273 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
2 case citations
Sejour v. Steven Davis Farms, LLC
28 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (N.D. Florida, 2014)
2 case citations
Opinion No. 102-77 (1977)
(Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1977)
Murillo v. Texas a & M University System
921 F. Supp. 443 (S.D. Texas, 1996)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 97–470, §4, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2585.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
That Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3)(B), is act June 23, 1947, ch. 120, 61 Stat. 136, known as the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, which is classified principally to chapter 7 (§141 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 141 of this title and Tables.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1803.