FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 19
Repealed. Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §702(a)(10), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Repealed. Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §702(a)(10), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 U.S.C. § 1591 (Repealed. Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §702(a)(10), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milwaukee County, Wisconsin v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
771 F.2d 983 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor
853 F.2d 439 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security v. United States Department of Labor
893 F.2d 1319 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Police Department of the City of Chicago v. United States Department of Labor
737 F.2d 1466 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Action, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
789 F.2d 1453 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States Department of Labor
723 F.2d 733 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Montgomery County, Maryland v. Department of Labor
757 F.2d 1510 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Cabinet for Human Resources v. William Brock, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
845 F.2d 117 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
City of Newark, New Jersey v. United States Department of Labor
2 F.3d 31 (Third Circuit, 1993)
City of Edmonds v. United States Department of Labor
749 F.2d 1419 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Pierce County v. United States, by and Through the Department of Labor, and Raymond Donovan, Its Secretary of Labor, Etc.
759 F.2d 1398 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
In the Matter of City of St. Louis, Missouri v. United States Department of Labor
787 F.2d 342 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
Tennessee Department of Employment Security v. Secretary of Labor
801 F.2d 170 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment v. United States Department of Labor
875 F.2d 791 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Mobile Consortium of Ceta, Alabama v. United States Department of Labor
745 F.2d 1416 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Colon Collazo v. Cordero-Santiago
698 F. Supp. 30 (D. Puerto Rico, 1988)
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. U.S. Dept. Of Labor
790 F.2d 782 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Lowell Consortium v. United States Department of Labor
893 F.2d 432 (First Circuit, 1990)
William E. Leventhal v. United States Department of Labor, and City of Los Angeles
766 F.2d 1351 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Corliss J. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent
879 F.2d 327 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
Editorial Notes
Section, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §181, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1354; Pub. L. 97–404, §1(i), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2026, related to transition between the Comprehensive Employment Training Act and this chapter.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of Repeal
Repeal effective July 1, 1993, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 102–367, formerly set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 1501 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of Repeal
Repeal effective July 1, 1993, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 102–367, formerly set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 1501 of this title.