FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
Limitation of actions
29 U.S.C. § 1113
Title29 — Labor
SubtitleB
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
Partpart 4—fiduciary responsibility
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1113 (Limitation of actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1113.
Text
No action may be commenced under this subchapter with respect to a fiduciary's breach of any responsibility, duty, or obligation under this part, or with respect to a violation of this part, after the earlier of—
(1)six years after (A) the date of the last action which constituted a part of the breach or violation, or (B) in the case of an omission the latest date on which the fiduciary could have cured the breach or violation, or
(2)three years after the earliest date on which the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the breach or violation;
except that in the case of fraud or concealment, such action may be commenced not later than six years after the date of discovery of such breach or violation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. Johnson
158 F.3d 806 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Merck & Co. v. Reynolds
559 U.S. 633 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Frommert v. Conkright
433 F.3d 254 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Reich v. Lancaster
55 F.3d 1034 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Landwehr v. DuPree
72 F.3d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Wolin v. Smith Barney Inc.
83 F.3d 847 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Barker v. American Mobil Power Corp.
64 F.3d 1397 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Pisciotta v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
91 F.3d 1326 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
LaScala v. Scrufari
479 F.3d 213 (Second Circuit, 2007)
Waller v. Blue Cross
32 F.3d 1337 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Glenn Tibble v. Edison International
820 F.3d 1041 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Flanagan v. Inland Empire Electrical Workers Pension Plan & Trust
3 F.3d 1246 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Debra Shaw v. The McFarland Clinic, P.C.
363 F.3d 744 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Insurance Program Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
189 F.3d 1160 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Perlman v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
932 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D. New York, 2013)
Fanning v. National Grid/Keyspan
649 F. App'x 48 (Second Circuit, 2016)
DeFazio v. Hollister, Inc.
854 F. Supp. 2d 770 (E.D. California, 2012)
Reich v. Johnson
891 F. Supp. 208 (D. New Jersey, 1995)
Bernaola v. Checksmart Fin. LLC
322 F. Supp. 3d 830 (S.D. Ohio, 2018)
Tibble v. Edison Int'l
135 S. Ct. 43 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §413, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 889; Pub. L. 100–203, title IX, §9342(b), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–371; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §§7881(j)(4), 7894(e)(5), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2443, 2450.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1989—Pub. L. 101–239, §7894(e)(5), struck out "(a)" before "No action".
Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–239, §7881(j)(4), struck out comma after "violation".
1987—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–203 struck out "(A)" after "date" and struck out "or (B) on which a report from which he could reasonably be expected to have obtained knowledge of such breach or violation was filed with the Secretary under this subchapter".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1989 Amendment
Amendment by section 7881(j)(4) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Pension Protection Act, Pub. L. 100–203, §§9302–9346, to which such amendment relates, see section 7882 of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendment by section 7894(e)(5) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if originally included in the provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93–406, to which such amendment relates, see section 7894(i) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–203 applicable with respect to reports required to be filed after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 9342(d)(1) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as a note under section 1132 of this title.
Amendments
1989—Pub. L. 101–239, §7894(e)(5), struck out "(a)" before "No action".
Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–239, §7881(j)(4), struck out comma after "violation".
1987—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–203 struck out "(A)" after "date" and struck out "or (B) on which a report from which he could reasonably be expected to have obtained knowledge of such breach or violation was filed with the Secretary under this subchapter".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1989 Amendment
Amendment by section 7881(j)(4) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Pension Protection Act, Pub. L. 100–203, §§9302–9346, to which such amendment relates, see section 7882 of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendment by section 7894(e)(5) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if originally included in the provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93–406, to which such amendment relates, see section 7894(i) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–203 applicable with respect to reports required to be filed after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 9342(d)(1) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as a note under section 1132 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1113.