Tibble v. Edison Int'l

Supreme Court

Tibble v. Edison Int'l

135 S. Ct. 43, 189 L. Ed. 2d 895, 83 U.S.L.W. 3183, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4901

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 2, 2014·No. No. 13–550.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed."

Tibble v. Edison Int'l, 135 S. Ct. 43, 189 L. Ed. 2d 895, 83 U.S.L.W. 3183, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4901 (U.S. 2014).

Pincite

135 S. Ct. 43 (Tibble v. Edison Int'l) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related