FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Bonds executed under federal law
28 U.S.C. § 1352
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1352 (Bonds executed under federal law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1352.
Text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with State courts, of any action on a bond executed under any law of the United States, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
405 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. Holkesvick
545 F.2d 1164 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Clement J. Sheeran v. General Electric Company, a New York Corporation
593 F.2d 93 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Koppers Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.
337 F.2d 499 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
Continental Casualty Company, Inc. v. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., Allsop Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.
336 F.2d 445 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
United States of America for and on Behalf of Mississippi Road Supply Co. v. H. R. Morgan, Inc. And U. S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
542 F.2d 262 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Commodities Export Co., a Michigan Corporation v. U.S. Customs Service, an Agency of the U.S. Government
957 F.2d 223 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Ismael Felipe Arnaiz v. All State Bail Bonds, Inc. And Jerry Miller, Movants-Appellants
842 F.2d 217 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Missouri-Illinois Tractor & Equipment Co., Inc. v. D & L Construction Company & Associates and Continental Casualty Company
337 F.2d 507 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
United States ex rel. General Electric Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
11 F.3d 577 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
Seaboard Surety Co., a Corporate Entity, Etc. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of C.D.G., Inc., a Corporate Entity
355 F.2d 139 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Interstate Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. International Fidelity Insurance Company
200 F.3d 456 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
United States ex rel. Bryant Electric Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
297 F.2d 665 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Autrey v. Williams & Dunlap
343 F.2d 730 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Anthony Skirlick, as an Individual and as a Representative of a Class v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
852 F.2d 1376 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Irving Trust Co. v. Nationwide Leisure Corp.
93 F.R.D. 102 (S.D. New York, 1981)
United States ex rel. Texas Bitulithic Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
813 F.2d 697 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
City of Riviera Beach v. That Certain Unnamed Gray, Two-Story Vessel Approximately Fifty-Seven Feet in Length
672 F. App'x 892 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Phillip E. Warren v. Alva E. Kimrey and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
489 F.2d 339 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States ex rel. Western Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Woerfel Corp.
337 F. Supp. 895 (D. North Dakota, 1972)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §506, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
This section is necessary to permit actions in the district courts upon any bond authorized by a law of the United States. In the absence of this new provision, such actions could not be maintained except by the United States, where the amount and other jurisdictional requisites did not exist. The new section also makes clear that it does not affect the right to prosecute such actions in State courts.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
This section is necessary to permit actions in the district courts upon any bond authorized by a law of the United States. In the absence of this new provision, such actions could not be maintained except by the United States, where the amount and other jurisdictional requisites did not exist. The new section also makes clear that it does not affect the right to prosecute such actions in State courts.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1352.