FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 47
Fraud and related activity in connection with obtaining confidential phone records information of a covered entity
18 U.S.C. § 1039
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter47 — FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1039 (Fraud and related activity in connection with obtaining confidential phone records information of a covered entity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1039.
Text
(a)Criminal Violation.—Whoever, in interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly and intentionally obtains, or attempts to obtain, confidential phone records information of a covered entity, by—
(1)making false or fraudulent statements or representations to an employee of a covered entity;
(2)making such false or fraudulent statements or representations to a customer of a covered entity;
(3)providing a document to a covered entity knowing that such document is false or fraudulent; or
(4)accessing customer accounts of a covered entity via the Internet, or by means of conduct that violates section 1030 of this title, without prior authorization from the customer to whom such confidential phone records information relates;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 10 year
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Federal Trade Commission v. Accusearch Inc.
570 F.3d 1187 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
825 F.3d 674 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
BABAISAKOV
24 I. & N. Dec. 306 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2007)
Mozilla Corporation v. FCC
940 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
555 F.3d 996 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Canuto v. United States
651 F. App'x 996 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Lawlor v. North American Corp. of Illinois
949 N.E.2d 155 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2011)
Real View, LLC v. 20-20 Technologies, Inc.
789 F. Supp. 2d 268 (D. Massachusetts, 2011)
Pacific Networks Corp. v. FCC
77 F.4th 1160 (D.C. Circuit, 2023)
Lureen v. Holl
(D. South Dakota, 2017)
United States v. Williams
441 F. App'x 52 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Dickson v. Mitta
(N.D. New York, 2022)
HAYWARD v. SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEMS
(E.D. Pennsylvania, 2024)
Lawlor v. North American Corporation of Illinois
(Appellate Court of Illinois, 2011)
HARTLEY v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
(E.D. Pennsylvania, 2024)
Morgan v. Twitter Inc
(E.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 109–476, §3(a), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3569.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 222(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsecs. (b)(2) and (c)(2), is classified to section 222(d) of Title 47, Telecommunications.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Findings
Pub. L. 109–476, §2, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3568, provided that: "Congress finds that—
"(1) telephone records can be of great use to criminals because the information contained in call logs may include a wealth of personal data;
"(2) call logs may reveal the names of telephone users' doctors, public and private relationships, business associates, and more;
"(3) call logs are typically maintained for the exclusive use of phone companies, their authorized agents, and authorized consumers;
"(4) telephone records have been obtained without the knowledge or consent of consumers through the use of a number of fraudulent methods and devices that include—
"(A) telephone company employees selling data to unauthorized data brokers;
"(B) 'pretexting', whereby a data broker or other person represents that they are an authorized consumer and convinces an agent of the telephone company to release the data; or
"(C) gaining unauthorized Internet access to account data by improperly activating a consumer's account management features on a phone company's webpage or contracting with an Internet-based data broker who trafficks in such records; and
"(5) the unauthorized disclosure of telephone records not only assaults individual privacy but, in some instances, may further acts of domestic violence or stalking, compromise the personal safety of law enforcement officers, their families, victims of crime, witnesses, or confidential informants, and undermine the integrity of law enforcement investigations."
References in Text
Section 222(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsecs. (b)(2) and (c)(2), is classified to section 222(d) of Title 47, Telecommunications.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Findings
Pub. L. 109–476, §2, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3568, provided that: "Congress finds that—
"(1) telephone records can be of great use to criminals because the information contained in call logs may include a wealth of personal data;
"(2) call logs may reveal the names of telephone users' doctors, public and private relationships, business associates, and more;
"(3) call logs are typically maintained for the exclusive use of phone companies, their authorized agents, and authorized consumers;
"(4) telephone records have been obtained without the knowledge or consent of consumers through the use of a number of fraudulent methods and devices that include—
"(A) telephone company employees selling data to unauthorized data brokers;
"(B) 'pretexting', whereby a data broker or other person represents that they are an authorized consumer and convinces an agent of the telephone company to release the data; or
"(C) gaining unauthorized Internet access to account data by improperly activating a consumer's account management features on a phone company's webpage or contracting with an Internet-based data broker who trafficks in such records; and
"(5) the unauthorized disclosure of telephone records not only assaults individual privacy but, in some instances, may further acts of domestic violence or stalking, compromise the personal safety of law enforcement officers, their families, victims of crime, witnesses, or confidential informants, and undermine the integrity of law enforcement investigations."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1039.