FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 61
Exclusive territorial licenses to manufacture, distribute, and sell trademarked soft drink products; ultimate resale to consumers; substantial and effective competition
15 U.S.C. § 3501
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter61 — SOFT DRINK INTERBRAND COMPETITION
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 3501 (Exclusive territorial licenses to manufacture, distribute, and sell trademarked soft drink products; ultimate resale to consumers; substantial and effective competition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 3501.
Text
Nothing contained in any antitrust law shall render unlawful the inclusion and enforcement in any trademark licensing contract or agreement, pursuant to which the licensee engages in the manufacture (including manufacture by a sublicensee, agent, or subcontractor), distribution, and sale of a trademarked soft drink product, of provisions granting the licensee the sole and exclusive right to manufacture, distribute, and sell such product in a defined geographic area or limiting the licensee, directly or indirectly, to the manufacture, distribution, and sale of such product only for ultimate resale to consumers within a defined geographic area: Provided, That such product is in substantial and effective competition with other products of the same general class in the relevant market or marke
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. Pepsico, Inc.
836 F.2d 173 (Third Circuit, 1988)
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.
431 F.3d 1241 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. v. Checkers, Inc.
754 F.2d 10 (First Circuit, 1985)
Owens v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.
412 S.E.2d 636 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1992)
Northern Bottling Co., Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.
5 F.4th 917 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
Federal Trade Commission v. Coca-Cola Co.
641 F. Supp. 1128 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Brunson Communications, Inc. v. Arbitron, Inc.
239 F. Supp. 2d 550 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ogden, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
4 F.3d 930 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
State v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of the Southwest
697 S.W.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
O'NEILL v. Coca-Cola Co.
669 F. Supp. 217 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. PepsiCo, Inc.
658 F. Supp. 816 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1987)
Coca-Cola Bottling Company of the Southwest v. Federal Trade Commission
85 F.3d 1139 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.
770 F. Supp. 285 (D. Maryland, 1991)
Brown Bottling Group, Inc. v. Imperial Trading Co., L.L.C.
(S.D. Mississippi, 2022)
Ex parte BTC Wholesale Distributors, Inc. Arhaan, LLC Birmingham Wholesale, LLC City Wholesale, Inc. and The H.T. Hackney Co. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Buffalo Rock Company, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-19-900217).
(Supreme Court of Alabama, 2023)
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of the Southwest v. F.T.C.
(Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 96–308, §2, July 9, 1980, 94 Stat. 939.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 96–308, §1, July 9, 1980, 94 Stat. 939, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act'."
Suspension of Statute of Limitations on Institution of Antitrust Proceedings by United States; Enforcement of Trademark Licensing Agreement Provisions Concerning Soft Drink Products
Pub. L. 96–308, §4, July 9, 1980, 94 Stat. 939, provided that: "In the case of any proceeding instituted by the United States described in subsection (i) of section 5 of the Clayton Act (relating to suspension of the statute of limitations on the institution of proceedings by the United States) (15 U.S.C. 16(i)) which is pending on the date of the enactment of this Act [July 9, 1980], that subsection shall not apply with respect to any right of action referred to in that subsection based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in that proceeding consisting of the existence or enforcement of any provision described in section 2 of this Act [this section] in any trademark licensing contract or agreement described in that section."
Short Title
Pub. L. 96–308, §1, July 9, 1980, 94 Stat. 939, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act'."
Suspension of Statute of Limitations on Institution of Antitrust Proceedings by United States; Enforcement of Trademark Licensing Agreement Provisions Concerning Soft Drink Products
Pub. L. 96–308, §4, July 9, 1980, 94 Stat. 939, provided that: "In the case of any proceeding instituted by the United States described in subsection (i) of section 5 of the Clayton Act (relating to suspension of the statute of limitations on the institution of proceedings by the United States) (15 U.S.C. 16(i)) which is pending on the date of the enactment of this Act [July 9, 1980], that subsection shall not apply with respect to any right of action referred to in that subsection based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in that proceeding consisting of the existence or enforcement of any provision described in section 2 of this Act [this section] in any trademark licensing contract or agreement described in that section."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 3501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/3501.