FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 27

Motor vehicle franchise contract dispute resolution process

15 U.S.C. § 1226
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter27 — AUTOMOBILE DEALER SUITS AGAINST MANUFACTURERS

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 1226 (Motor vehicle franchise contract dispute resolution process) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 1226.

Text

(a)Election of arbitration For purposes of this subsection—
(A)the term "motor vehicle" has the meaning given such term in section 30102(6) of title 49; 1 and
(B)the term "motor vehicle franchise contract" means a contract under which a motor vehicle manufacturer, importer, or distributor sells motor vehicles to any other person for resale to an ultimate purchaser and authorizes such other person to repair and service the manufacturer's motor vehicles. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whenever a motor vehicle franchise contract provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy arising out of or relating to such contract, arbitration may be used to settle such controversy only if after such controversy arises all parties to such controversy consent in writing to use

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
584 U.S. 497 (Supreme Court, 2018)
890 case citations
Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood
132 S. Ct. 665 (Supreme Court, 2012)
338 case citations
Anthony L. Arciniaga v. General Motors Corporation, Docket No. 05-6299-Cv
460 F.3d 231 (Second Circuit, 2006)
92 case citations
Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Co.
19 F.4th 938 (Sixth Circuit, 2021)
52 case citations
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
834 F.3d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
51 case citations
Kevin Ziober v. Blb Resources, Inc.
839 F.3d 814 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
28 case citations
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc.
666 F.3d 932 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
28 case citations
Ford Motor Co. v. Ghreiwati Auto
945 F. Supp. 2d 851 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
13 case citations
Champion Auto Sales, LLC v. Polaris Sales Inc.
943 F. Supp. 2d 346 (E.D. New York, 2013)
11 case citations
Major Cadillac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
280 S.W.3d 717 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
9 case citations
Pride v. Ford Motor Co.
341 F. Supp. 2d 617 (N.D. Mississippi, 2004)
5 case citations
Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Co.
228 F. Supp. 3d 797 (E.D. Michigan, 2017)
5 case citations
Adam U. Steines v. Westgate Palace, L.L.C.
113 F.4th 1335 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
3 case citations
Arciniaga v. General Motors Corp.
418 F. Supp. 2d 374 (S.D. New York, 2005)
1 case citations
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Sud's of Peoria, Inc.
474 F.3d 966 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
1 case citations
Birru v. Barr
(N.D. California, 2020)
Rodriguez Diaz v. Barr
(N.D. California, 2020)
Subaru of America, Inc. v. Putnam Automotive, Inc.
(California Court of Appeal, 2021)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11028, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1835.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
Section 30102(6) of title 49, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A), probably should be "section 30102(a)(6) of title 49", which was redesignated section 30102(a)(7) of title 49 by section 24109(b)(2) of Pub. L. 114–94, div. B, title XXIV, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1706.

Codification
Section was enacted as part of the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, and not as part of act Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1038, which comprises this chapter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/1226.