FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VI—PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE
Art. 30. Charges and specifications
10 U.S.C. § 830
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VI—PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 830 (Art. 30. Charges and specifications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 830.
Text
(a)In General.—Charges and specifications—
(1)may be preferred only by a person subject to this chapter; and
(2)shall be preferred by presentment in writing, signed under oath before a commissioned officer of the armed forces who is authorized to administer oaths.
(b)Required Content.—The writing under subsection (a) shall state that—
(1)the signer has personal knowledge of, or has investigated, the matters set forth in the charges and specifications; and
(2)the matters set forth in the charges and specifications are true, to the best of the knowledge and belief of the signer.
(c)Duty of Proper Authority.—When charges and specifications are preferred under subsection (a), the proper authority shall, as soon as practicable—
(1)inform the person accused of the charges and specificati
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. MacDonald
435 U.S. 850 (Supreme Court, 1978)
United States v. Baker
14 M.J. 361 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
State v. Morley
952 P.2d 167 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Ezell
6 M.J. 307 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Tibbs
15 C.M.A. 350 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)
United States v. Hamilton
41 M.J. 32 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1994)
United States v. McGraner
13 M.J. 408 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Washington
9 C.M.A. 131 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Kazena
11 M.J. 28 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
United States v. Mapes
59 M.J. 60 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2003)
United States v. Kirsch
15 C.M.A. 84 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)
United States v. Self
13 M.J. 132 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Boudreaux
35 M.J. 291 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
United States v. Dowell
10 M.J. 36 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
United States v. Douse
12 M.J. 473 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Alexander & U.S. v. Vanderschaaf
63 M.J. 269 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2006)
United States v. Ridley
22 M.J. 43 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1986)
United States v. Lilly
22 M.J. 620 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1986)
Wendy L. Wickham v. Alvin O. Hall, Colonel, U.S. Army, and United States
706 F.2d 713 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Miller
33 M.J. 235 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1991)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 47; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVI, §5201, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2904.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the word "they" is substituted for the words "the same". The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:
"(a) Charges and specifications shall be signed by a person subject to this chapter under oath before a commissioned officer of the armed forces authorized to administer oaths and shall state—
"(1) that the signer has personal knowledge of or has investigated, the matters set forth therein; and
"(2) that they are true in fact to the best of his knowledge and belief.
"(b) Upon the preferring of charges, the proper authority shall take immediate steps to determine what disposition should be made thereof in the interest of justice and discipline, and the person accused shall be informed of the charges against him as soon as practicable."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Timely Disposition of Nonprosecutable Sex-Related Offenses
Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §540C, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1366, provided that:
"(a) Policy Required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2019], the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a policy to ensure the timely disposition of nonprosecutable sex-related offenses.
"(b) Nonprosecutable Sex-related Offense Defined.—In this section, the term 'nonprosecutable sex-related offense' means an alleged sex-related offense (as that term is defined in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code) that a court-martial convening authority has declined to refer for trial by a general or special court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), due to a determination that there is insufficient evidence to support prosecution of the sex-related offense."
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:
"(a) Charges and specifications shall be signed by a person subject to this chapter under oath before a commissioned officer of the armed forces authorized to administer oaths and shall state—
"(1) that the signer has personal knowledge of or has investigated, the matters set forth therein; and
"(2) that they are true in fact to the best of his knowledge and belief.
"(b) Upon the preferring of charges, the proper authority shall take immediate steps to determine what disposition should be made thereof in the interest of justice and discipline, and the person accused shall be informed of the charges against him as soon as practicable."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Timely Disposition of Nonprosecutable Sex-Related Offenses
Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §540C, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1366, provided that:
"(a) Policy Required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2019], the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a policy to ensure the timely disposition of nonprosecutable sex-related offenses.
"(b) Nonprosecutable Sex-related Offense Defined.—In this section, the term 'nonprosecutable sex-related offense' means an alleged sex-related offense (as that term is defined in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code) that a court-martial convening authority has declined to refer for trial by a general or special court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), due to a determination that there is insufficient evidence to support prosecution of the sex-related offense."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/830.