FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter 55

Defense of certain suits arising out of medical malpractice

10 U.S.C. § 1089
Title10Armed Forces
Chapter55 — MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 1089 (Defense of certain suits arising out of medical malpractice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 1089.

Text

(a)The remedy against the United States provided by sections 1346(b) and 2672 of title 28 for damages for personal injury, including death, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical or other supporting personnel (including medical and dental technicians, nursing assistants, and therapists) of the armed forces, the National Guard while engaged in training or duty under section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32, the Department of Defense, the Armed Forces Retirement Home, or the Central Intelligence Agency in the performance of medical, dental, or related health care functions (including clinical studies and investigations) while acting within the scope of his duties or employment therein or therefor shall hereafter

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arkan Ali v. Donald Rumsfeld
649 F.3d 762 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
168 case citations
Sheila M. Jackson v. Paul A. Kelly
557 F.2d 735 (Tenth Circuit, 1977)
120 case citations
Mitchell v. Carlson
896 F.2d 128 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
87 case citations
Walter Lojuk v. Marjorie Quandt, Director of the Veterans Administration Hospital
706 F.2d 1456 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
72 case citations
Joyce Atkinson v. United States
825 F.2d 202 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
66 case citations
Joanne Bembenista v. United States
866 F.2d 493 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
50 case citations
Mildred M. Newman, and Melvin D. Newman v. Peter Soballe, M.D.
871 F.2d 969 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
29 case citations
Jean H. Pelphrey v. United States
674 F.2d 243 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
20 case citations
Miller v. United States
73 F.3d 878 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
11 case citations
Richard L. Hawe v. United States
670 F.2d 652 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
8 case citations
Aldridge v. Hartford Hospital
969 F. Supp. 816 (D. Connecticut, 1996)
7 case citations
United States v. Rust
38 M.J. 726 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1993)
5 case citations
Matsushita Electric Co. v. Zeigler
158 F.3d 1167 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
4 case citations
Martinez, Administratrix v. Shrock Et Al.
430 U.S. 920 (Supreme Court, 1977)
2 case citations
Leab v. Chambersburg Hospital
230 F.R.D. 395 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 94–464, §1(a), Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1985; amended Pub. L. 97–124, §2, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1666; Pub. L. 98–94, title IX, §934(a)–(c), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 651, 652; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1231(18)(A), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1533(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1733; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VII, §736(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1814; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, §931(b)(3), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 285; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §567(b)(2)(A), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1425; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VII, §713(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1803.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "to such a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical" for "if the physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical", struck out "involved is" before "serving under", and inserted "or a subcontract at any tier under such a contract that is authorized in accordance with the requirements of such section 1091" after "section 1091 of this title".
2011—Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 112–81 substituted "Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home" for "Armed Forces Retirement Home Board".
2008—Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 110–181 substituted "Director of the Central Intelligence Agency" for "Director of Central Intelligence".
2002—Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".
1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–85, §736(b)(1), inserted at end "This subsection shall also apply if the physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical or other supporting personnel (or the estate of such person) involved is serving under a personal services contract entered into under section 1091 of this title."
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 105–85, §736(b)(2), designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–510, §1533(a)(1)(A), substituted "Armed Forces Retirement Home" for "United States Soldiers' and Airmen's Home".
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 101–510, §1533(a)(1)(B), added par. (3) and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: "the Board of Commissioners of the United States Soldiers' and Airmen's home, in the case of an employee of the United States Soldiers' and Airmen's Home; and".
1987—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 100–180 inserted "the term" after "In this section,".
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–94, §934(a), inserted "the United States Soldiers' and Airmen's Home,".
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 98–94, §934(b), substituted "may, to the extent that the head of the agency concerned considers" for "or his designee may, to the extent that he or his designee deems".
Subsec. (g)(3), (4). Pub. L. 98–94, §934(c)(3), added par. (3) and redesignated former par. (3) as (4).
1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–124 inserted "the National Guard while engaged in training or duty under section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32," after "armed forces,".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 101–510 effective one year after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 1541 of Pub. L. 101–510, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 401 of Title 24, Hospitals and Asylums.

Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Pub. L. 98–94, title IX, §934(d), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 652, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply only to claims accruing on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 1983]."

Effective Date of 1981 Amendment
Pub. L. 97–124, §4, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1666, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [amending this section and section 2671 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure] and the repeal made by section 3 of this Act [repealing section 334 of Title 32, National Guard] shall apply only with respect to claims arising on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 29, 1981]."

Effective Date
Pub. L. 94–464, §4, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1989, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section, section 334 of Title 32, National Guard, section 2458a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and provisions set out as notes under this section and section 334 of Title 32] shall become effective on the date of its enactment [Oct. 8, 1976] and shall apply only to those claims accruing on or after such date of enactment."

Congressional Findings
Pub. L. 94–464, §2(a), Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1986, provided that: "The Congress finds—
"(1) that the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard are critical components of the defense posture of the United States;
"(2) that a medical capability is essential to the performance of the mission of the National Guard when in Federal service;
"(3) that the current medical malpractice crisis poses a serious threat to the availability of sufficient medical personnel for the National Guard; and
"(4) that in order to insure that such medical personnel will continue to be available to the National Guard, it is necessary for the Federal Government to assume responsibility for the payment of malpractice claims made against such personnel arising out of actions or omissions on the part of such personnel while they are performing certain training exercises."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/1089.