FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 171
Compromise
28 U.S.C. § 2677
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter171 — TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2677 (Compromise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2677.
Text
The Attorney General or his designee may arbitrate, compromise, or settle any claim cognizable under section 1346(b) of this title, after the commencement of an action thereon.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer
510 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Hendrickson v. United States
791 F.3d 354 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Helen D. Kelley and John E. Kelley v. United States of America, Ruth Semko
568 F.2d 259 (Second Circuit, 1978)
In the Matter or Lowell S. Fallick, Bankrupt-Appellant v. Harry Kehr
369 F.2d 899 (Second Circuit, 1966)
United States v. John M. Reilly
385 F.2d 225 (Tenth Circuit, 1967)
Anderson v. United States
46 A.3d 426 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)
Gerald Thompson, and Cynthia Thompson, Husband and Wife v. Daphne Wheeler, and John D. Risse, Additional Appeal of Daphne Wheeler
898 F.2d 406 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Blockston v. United States
278 F. Supp. 576 (D. Maryland, 1968)
Rowley v. United States
140 F. Supp. 295 (D. Utah, 1956)
Begay v. United States
16 Cl. Ct. 107 (Court of Claims, 1987)
Hubsch v. United States
338 U.S. 440 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Warren v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
724 F.2d 776 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
A.P. Ex Rel. Phinesee v. United States
556 F. App'x 132 (Third Circuit, 2014)
Dowling v. A.R.T. Inst. of Wash., Inc.
372 F. Supp. 3d 274 (D. Maryland, 2019)
Halbach v. Markham
106 F. Supp. 475 (D. New Jersey, 1952)
United Services Automobile Association Charlene Cozart v. United States
105 F.3d 185 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Schwartzman, Inc. v. ACF Industries, Inc.
167 F.R.D. 694 (D. New Mexico, 1996)
Collick v. United States
552 F. Supp. 2d 349 (E.D. New York, 2008)
Overseas National Airways, Inc. v. United States
766 F.2d 97 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Neal v. Derwinski
2 Vet. App. 296 (Veterans Claims, 1992)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 984; Pub. L. 89–506, §3, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 307.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §934 (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §413, 60 Stat. 845).
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
This section was renumbered "2676" by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1966—Pub. L. 89–506 struck out provision requiring that approval of court be obtained before Attorney General could arbitrate, compromise, or settle a claim after commencement of an action thereon.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 89–506 applicable to claims accruing six months or more after July 18, 1966, see section 10 of Pub. L. 89–506, set out as a note under section 2672 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §934 (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §413, 60 Stat. 845).
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
This section was renumbered "2676" by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1966—Pub. L. 89–506 struck out provision requiring that approval of court be obtained before Attorney General could arbitrate, compromise, or settle a claim after commencement of an action thereon.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 89–506 applicable to claims accruing six months or more after July 18, 1966, see section 10 of Pub. L. 89–506, set out as a note under section 2672 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2677.