Tennessee § 66-22-106 Postponement pending identification

Tennessee Statutes

§ 66-22-106 — Postponement pending identification

Tennessee § 66-22-106

Title66

This text of Tennessee § 66-22-106 (Postponement pending identification) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 (2026).

Text

(a)If the clerk or deputy clerk does not know, is not personally acquainted with, or does not have satisfactory evidence of a person wishing to make acknowledgment of the execution of an instrument, the clerk or deputy clerk shall file it, and note, on the record of the probate of deeds, the date of the presentation of the instrument, and the reason of the postponement of the acknowledgment; and then, within twenty (20) days, the party may produce witnesses before the clerk or deputy clerk, to prove the identity of the person so offering to acknowledge the same; and the deed, when acknowledged after such proof, shall take effect from the filing with the clerk.

(b)For purposes of this chapter, "know" or "personally acquainted with" means having an acquaintance, derived from association wi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) If the clerk or deputy clerk does not know, is not personally acquainted with, or does not have satisfactory evidence of a person wishing to make acknowledgment of the execution of an instrument, the clerk or deputy clerk shall file it, and note, on the record of the probate of deeds, the date of the presentation of the instrument, and the reason of the postponement of the acknowledgment; and then, within twenty (20) days, the party may produce witnesses before the clerk or deputy clerk, to prove the identity of the person so offering to acknowledge the same; and the deed, when acknowledged after such proof, shall take effect from the filing with the clerk. (b) For purposes of this chapter, "know" or "personally acquainted with" means having an acquaintance, derived from association with the individual in relation to other people and based upon a chain of circumstances surrounding the individual, which establishes the individual's identity with at least reasonable certainty. (c) For the purposes of this chapter, "satisfactory evidence" means the absence of any information, evidence, or other circumstances which would lead a reasonable person to believe that the person making the acknowledgment is not the individual such person claims to be and any one (1) of the following: (1) The oath or affirmation of a credible witness personally known to the officer that the person making the acknowledgment is personally known to the witness; (2) Reasonable reliance on the presentation to the officer of any one of the following, if the document is current or has been issued within five (5) years: (A) An identification card or driver's license issued by the department of safety; or (B) A passport issued by the United States department of state; or (3) Reasonable reliance on the presentation of any one (1) of the following, if the document is current or has been issued within five (5) years and contains a photograph and description of the person named on it, is signed by the person, bears a serial or other identifying number, and, in the event that the document is a passport, has been stamped by the United States immigration and naturalization service: (A) A passport issued by a foreign government; (B) A driver's license issued by a state other than this state; (C) An identification card issued by a state other than this state; or (D) An identification card issued by any branch of the armed forces of the United States. (d) An officer who has taken an acknowledgment pursuant to this section shall be presumed to have operated in accordance with this chapter. (e) Any party who files an action for damages based on the failure of the officer to establish the proper identity of the person making the acknowledgment shall have the burden of proof in establishing the negligence or misconduct of the officer.