South Carolina § 62-5-710 Declining jurisdiction; more appropriate forum; dismissal or stay of proceeding.

South Carolina Statutes

§ 62-5-710 — Declining jurisdiction; more appropriate forum; dismissal or stay of proceeding.

South Carolina § 62-5-710

Title 62SOUTH CAROLINA PROBATE CODE

Ch.ARTICLE 5 - PROTECTION OF PERSONS UNDER DISABILITY AND THEIR PROPERTY

This text of South Carolina § 62-5-710 (Declining jurisdiction; more appropriate forum; dismissal or stay of proceeding.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.C. Code Ann. § 62-5-710 (2026).

Text

(A)The court having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 62-5-707 to appoint a guardian or issue a protective order may decline to exercise its jurisdiction if it determines at any time that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.

(B)If the court declines to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (A), it either shall dismiss or stay the proceeding. The court may impose any condition the court considers just and proper, including the condition that a petition for the appointment of a guardian or issuance of a protective order be filed promptly in another state.

(C)In determining whether it is an appropriate forum, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including:

(1)the expressed preference of the alleged incapacitated individual;

(2)whether abuse, neglect,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(A) The court having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 62-5-707 to appoint a guardian or issue a protective order may decline to exercise its jurisdiction if it determines at any time that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. (B) If the court declines to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (A), it either shall dismiss or stay the proceeding. The court may impose any condition the court considers just and proper, including the condition that a petition for the appointment of a guardian or issuance of a protective order be filed promptly in another state. (C) In determining whether it is an appropriate forum, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including: (1) the expressed preference of the alleged incapacitated individual; (2) whether abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the alleged incapacitated individual has occurred or is likely to occur and which state could best protect the alleged incapacitated individual from the abuse, neglect, or exploitation; (3) the length of time the alleged incapacitated individual was physically present in or was a legal resident of this or another state; (4) the distance of the alleged incapacitated individual from the court in each state; (5) the financial circumstances of the alleged incapacitated individual's estate; (6) the nature and location of the evidence; (7) the ability of the court in each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present evidence; (8) the familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the proceeding; and (9) if an appointment is made, the court's ability to monitor the conduct of the guardian or conservator.

Legislative History

HISTORY: 2010 Act No. 213, SECTION 1, eff January 1, 2011; 2017 Act No. 87 (S.415), SECTION 5.B, eff January 1, 2019. Effect of Amendment 2017 Act No. 87, SECTION 5.B, in (B), substituted "either shall dismiss" for "shall either dismiss"; in (C)(1) through (C)(4), substituted "alleged incapacitated individual" for "respondent"; and in (C)(5), substituted "alleged incapacitated individual's" for "respondent's".