Oklahoma § 58-61 Causes for contesting will after probate.

Oklahoma Statutes

§ 58-61 — Causes for contesting will after probate.

Oklahoma § 58-61

Title 58Probate Procedure

This text of Oklahoma § 58-61 (Causes for contesting will after probate.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okla. Stat. tit. 58, § 58-61 (2026).

Text

When a will has been admitted to probate, any person interested therein may at any time within three (3) months from the date the will was admitted to probate contest the same or the validity of the will. For that purpose he must file in the court in which the will was proved a sworn petition in writing containing his allegations, that evidence discovered since the probate of the will, the material facts of which must be set forth, shows: 1. That a will of a later date than the one proved by the decedent, revoking or changing the will, has been discovered, and is offered; or 2. That some jurisdictional fact was wanting in the probate; or 3. That the testator was not competent, free from duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence when the will allowed was made; or 4. That the will was not du

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

When a will has been admitted to probate, any person interested therein may at any time within three (3) months from the date the will was admitted to probate contest the same or the validity of the will. For that purpose he must file in the court in which the will was proved a sworn petition in writing containing his allegations, that evidence discovered since the probate of the will, the material facts of which must be set forth, shows: 1. That a will of a later date than the one proved by the decedent, revoking or changing the will, has been discovered, and is offered; or 2. That some jurisdictional fact was wanting in the probate; or 3. That the testator was not competent, free from duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence when the will allowed was made; or 4. That the will was not duly executed and attested.