Nebraska Statutes

§ 87-302 — Deceptive trade practices; enumerated

Nebraska § 87-302
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 87Trade Practices

This text of Nebraska § 87-302 (Deceptive trade practices; enumerated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-302 (2026).

Text

(a)A person engages in a deceptive trade practice when, in the course of his or her business, vocation, or occupation, he or she:
(1)Passes off goods or services as those of another;
(2)Causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services;
(3)Causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to affiliation, connection, or association with, or certification by, another;
(4)Uses deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with goods or services;
(5)Represents that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities that they do not have or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connectio

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WWP, INC. v. Wounded Warriors Family Support, Inc.
628 F.3d 1032 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
42 case citations
Infogroup, Inc. v. DatabaseLLC
95 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (D. Nebraska, 2015)
28 case citations
Richdale Development Co. v. McNeil Co.
508 N.W.2d 853 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
25 case citations
State v. Irons
574 N.W.2d 144 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
19 case citations
WWP, INC. v. Wounded Warriors, Inc.
566 F. Supp. 2d 970 (D. Nebraska, 2008)
16 case citations
Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Novak
648 F. Supp. 905 (D. Nebraska, 1986)
15 case citations
Raad v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
13 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Nebraska, 1998)
11 case citations
Midway Mfg. Co. v. Dirkschneider
571 F. Supp. 282 (D. Nebraska, 1983)
6 case citations
JDR Industries, Inc. v. McDowell
121 F. Supp. 3d 872 (D. Nebraska, 2015)
5 case citations
Ellison Educational Equipment, Inc. v. Accu-Cut System, Inc.
769 F. Supp. 1090 (D. Nebraska, 1991)
4 case citations
Hollins v. Debt Relief of America
479 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (D. Nebraska, 2007)
4 case citations
Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n v. Equitable Mortgage Corp.
662 N.W.2d 205 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2003)
3 case citations
Kuper Industries, LLC v. Reid
89 F. Supp. 3d 1005 (D. Nebraska, 2015)
1 case citations
Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Novak
836 F.2d 397 (Eighth Circuit, 1988)
1 case citations
Crabar/GBF, Inc. v. Wright
(D. Nebraska, 2019)
Denali Real Estate v. Denali Custom Builders
302 Neb. 984 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
JB & Assocs. v. Nebraska Cancer Coalition
303 Neb. 855 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1969, c. 855, § 2, p. 3222; Laws 1974, LB 327, § 2; Laws 1976, LB 820, § 1; Laws 1979, LB 257, § 1; Laws 1988, LB 180, § 1; Laws 1991, LB 408, § 1; Laws 1993, LB 305, § 32; Laws 2003, LB 118, § 1; Laws 2008, LB123, § 29; Laws 2008, LB781, § 1; Laws 2009, LB155, § 18; Laws 2010, LB801, § 2; Laws 2016, LB835, § 25; Laws 2016, LB1009, § 9; Laws 2024, LB934, § 4; Laws 2024, LB1073, § 35; Laws 2025, LB246, § 5; Laws 2025, LB383, § 25; Laws 2025, LB385, § 1. Note: The Revisor of Statutes has pursuant to section 49-769 correlated LB246, section 5, with LB383, section 25, and LB385, section 1, to reflect all amendments. Note: Changes made by LB246 became effective September 3, 2025. Changes made by LB383 became operative September 3, 2025. Changes made by LB385 became effective September 3, 2025. Cross References: Nebraska Foreclosure Protection Act, see section 76-2701. Annotations: Pursuant to subdivision (a)(9) of this section, a product disparagement claim alleging the disparagement of the goods, services, or business "of another" by false or misleading representation of fact requires that the offending statements be "of and concerning" a claimant's goods or services. Determining whether a statement is "of and concerning" a claimant's goods or services requires the consideration of the circumstances surrounding the statement but also requires more than general, industry-wide allegations. JB & Assocs. v. Nebraska Cancer Coalition, 303 Neb. 855, 932 N.W.2d 71 (2019). Denali Custom Builders, Inc., engaged in a deceptive trade practice when its use of "Denali Custom Builders" in the course of its business and the similarity of the fonts and colors used on its signage and its website caused confusion regarding the source of goods or services and its affiliation or association with Denali Real Estate's entities. Denali Real Estate v. Denali Custom Builders, 302 Neb. 984, 926 N.W.2d 610 (2019). To establish a violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, there must have been a representation regarding the nature of goods or services and the representation must have been for characteristics or benefits that the goods or services did not have. State ex rel. Stenberg v. Consumer's Choice Foods, 276 Neb. 481, 755 N.W.2d 583 (2008). Pursuant to subsection (a)(12) of this section, criminal prosecutions for chain distribution schemes are not limited to prosecution under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. State v. Irons, 254 Neb. 18, 574 N.W.2d 144 (1998). Although use of word "similar" is not deceptive, as a whole a comparative advertisement which misrepresents that the consumer would have to wait for competitor's product, which makes unauthorized use of competitor's sample book, and which makes unsubstantiated comparison as to savings violates this act. Kirsch Fabric Corp. v. Brookstein Enterprises, Inc., 209 Neb. 666, 309 N.W.2d 328 (1981). Nebraska Deceptive Trade Practices Act prohibits a broad panoply of deceptive trade practices, including passing of goods and services of another as one's own, confusing consumers as to the origin of the goods. Midway Mfg. Co. v. Dirkschneider, 571 F.Supp. 282 (D. Neb. 1983). Successor to manufacturer in representing it owned trademark owned by distributor and in using trademark in its corporate name, violated this act. Wrist-Rocket Manuf. Co., Inc. v. Saunders, 379 F.Supp. 902 (D. Neb. 1974).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 87-302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/87-302.