Nebraska Statutes
§ 70-655 — Reasonable rates required; negotiated rates authorized; conditions
Nebraska § 70-655
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 70Power Districts and Corporations
This text of Nebraska § 70-655 (Reasonable rates required; negotiated rates authorized; conditions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 70-655 (2026).
Text
(1)Except as otherwise provided
in this section, the board of directors of any district organized under or
subject to Chapter 70, article 6, shall have the power and be required to
fix, establish, and collect adequate rates, tolls, rents, and other charges
for electrical energy, water service, water storage, and for any and all other
commodities, including ethanol and hydrogen, services, or facilities sold,
furnished, or supplied by the district, which rates, tolls, rents, and charges
shall be fair, reasonable, nondiscriminatory, and so adjusted as in a fair
and equitable manner to confer upon and distribute among the users and consumers
of commodities and services furnished or sold by the district the benefits
of a successful and profitable operation and conduct of the business of the
di
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nucor Corporation v. Nebraska Public Power District
891 F.2d 1343 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Ne. Neb. Pub. Power Dist. v. Neb. Pub. Power Dist. (In Re Ne. Neb. Pub. Power Dist. )
300 Neb. 237 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
T v. Transmission, Inc. v. City of Lincoln
374 N.W.2d 49 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Nebraska Public Power District v. City of York
326 N.W.2d 22 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
Jeffrey Lake Development, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District
633 N.W.2d 102 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
Lanphier v. Omaha Public Power District
417 N.W.2d 17 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
McGinley v. Wheat Belt Public Power District
332 N.W.2d 915 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Alliant Energy v. Nebraska Public Power District
347 F.3d 1046 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
In re Application of Northeast Neb. Pub. Power Dist.
300 Neb. 237 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Jeffrey Lake Development, Incorporated v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District
568 N.W.2d 585 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
McGinley v. WHEAT BELT PUBLIC POWER DIST.
332 N.W.2d 915 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Opinion No. (1982)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1982)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1933, c. 86, § 13, p. 353; Laws 1937, c. 152, § 8, p. 589; Laws 1939, c. 89, § 1, p. 388; C.S.Supp.,1941, § 70-713; R.S.1943, § 70-655; Laws 1981, LB 181, § 26; Laws 1986, LB 1230, § 47; Laws 1995, LB 828, § 2; Laws 2001, LB 243, § 1; Laws 2005, LB 139, § 16; Laws 2012, LB1043, § 1.
Cross References: Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, see section 70-701. Municipal Cooperative Financing Act, see section 18-2401. Nebraska Nonprofit Corporation Act, see section 21-1901.
Annotations: A discount provided only to wholesale customers who renewed their contractual relationship with Nebraska Public Power District was not discriminatory under the circumstances. In re Application of Northeast Neb. Pub. Power Dist., 300 Neb. 237, 912 N.W.2d 884 (2018). Rent collected under this section would not necessarily have to be cash rent, but would only have to be reasonable consideration. Jeffrey Lake Dev. v. Central Neb. Pub. Power and Irr. Dist., 262 Neb. 515, 633 N.W.2d 102 (2001). A dissimilar rate may not be imposed for similar service solely on the basis that the additional source of the power or energy is more costly than previous sources. All of the sources must properly be blended into a rate which results in all customers obtaining the same service under the same conditions being charged the same rate. McGinley v. Wheat Belt P. P. Dist., 214 Neb. 178, 332 N.W.2d 915 (1983). Potentially conflicting interests within a class are incompatible with the maintenance of a true class action and this aspect may be disposed of upon motion for summary judgment. Blankenship v. Omaha P. P. Dist., 195 Neb. 170, 237 N.W.2d 86 (1976). It was intended to permit the business of a power district to be operated in a successful and profitable manner. City of O'Neill v. Consumers P. P. Dist., 179 Neb. 773, 140 N.W.2d 644 (1966). Board of directors is authorized to establish and collect adequate rates for electrical energy. York County Rural P. P. Dist. v. O'Connor, 172 Neb. 602, 111 N.W.2d 376 (1961). Powers conferred are intended to permit district to be operated in a successful and profitable manner. United Community Services v. Omaha Nat. Bank, 162 Neb. 786, 77 N.W.2d 576 (1956). Under assumed contract, district could not increase annual maintenance charge. Faught v. Platte Valley P. P. & I. Dist., 155 Neb. 141, 51 N.W.2d 253 (1952). District is not exempt from payment of charges under Federal Power Act. Central Neb. P. P. & I. Dist. v. Federal Power Commission, 160 F.2d 782 (8th Cir. 1947).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 70-655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/70-655.