Nebraska Statutes

§ 48-139 — Compensation; lump-sum settlement; submitted to Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court; procedure; filing of release; form; contents; payment; fees

Nebraska § 48-139

This text of Nebraska § 48-139 (Compensation; lump-sum settlement; submitted to Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court; procedure; filing of release; form; contents; payment; fees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-139 (2026).

Text

(1)(a) Whenever an injured employee or his or her dependents and the employer agree that the amounts of compensation due as periodic payments for death, permanent disability, or claimed permanent disability under the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act shall be commuted to one or more lump-sum payments, such settlement shall be submitted to the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court for approval as provided in subsection (2) of this section if:
(i)The employee is not represented by counsel;
(ii)The employee, at the time the settlement is executed, is eligible for medicare, is a medicare beneficiary, or has a reasonable expectation of becoming eligible for medicare within thirty months after the date the settlement is executed. This subdivision (ii) is not applicable if the employee's right

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-op
835 N.W.2d 30 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
134 case citations
State v. Sikes
834 N.W.2d 609 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
66 case citations
Hollandsworth v. Nebraska Partners
619 N.W.2d 579 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
36 case citations
Bruning v. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C.
551 N.W.2d 266 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
25 case citations
Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental Plan
491 N.W.2d 356 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1992)
16 case citations
Allen v. IBP, Inc.
363 N.W.2d 520 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
13 case citations
Loyd v. Family Dollar Stores of Neb.
304 Neb. 883 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
5 case citations
Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools v. Thorell
723 N.W.2d 506 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2006)
3 case citations
Dragon v. Cheesecake Factory
300 Neb. 548 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Dukes v. University of Nebraska
679 N.W.2d 249 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2004)
Frans v. Waldinger Corp.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Hunt v. Pick's Pack-Hauler
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2015)
Kaiman v. MERCY MIDLANDS MED. & DENTAL PLAN
491 N.W.2d 356 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1992)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1917, c. 85, § 16, p. 212; Laws 1921, c. 122, § 1, p. 526; C.S.1922, § 3063; C.S.1929, § 48-140; Laws 1935, c. 57, § 25, p. 199; C.S.Supp.,1941, § 48-140; R.S.1943, § 48-139; Laws 1951, c. 153, § 1, p. 623; Laws 1975, LB 187, § 4; Laws 1977, LB 126, § 3; Laws 1978, LB 649, § 3; Laws 1986, LB 811, § 57; Laws 1993, LB 757, § 10; Laws 2002, LB 417, § 3; Laws 2009, LB630, § 6; Laws 2014, LB961, § 11; Laws 2018, LB953, § 1; Laws 2021, LB256, § 1. Annotations: 1. Lump sum settlement 2. Commutation 3. Release 1. Lump sum settlement If an application for approval of a lump-sum settlement is not approved, the workers' compensation court may (1) dismiss the application at the cost of the employer or (2) continue the hearing, in the discretion of the compensation court. Loyd v. Family Dollar Stores of Neb., 304 Neb. 883, 937 N.W.2d 487 (2020). Pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, a lump-sum settlement must be submitted to the compensation court for approval when the claimant is a Medicare beneficiary. Loyd v. Family Dollar Stores of Neb., 304 Neb. 883, 937 N.W.2d 487 (2020). Where lump sum settlement is made and later application is made for further compensation for disability claimed not covered by settlement, burden of proof is on employee. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. v. Warner, 127 Neb. 796, 257 N.W. 224 (1934). Where approved lump sum settlement, accepted by employee before death, was complete compensation, widow was not entitled to further award. Lincoln Packing Co. v. Coe, 120 Neb. 299, 232 N.W. 92 (1930). Final power to award lump sum settlement for employee's death or permanent disability rests with district court, subject to review. Jackson v. Ford Motor Co., 115 Neb. 758, 214 N.W. 631 (1927). Lump sum settlements are authorized only in sound discretion of district court. Myers v. Armour & Co., 103 Neb. 407, 172 N.W. 45 (1919). Sections 48-140 and 48-141 and this section emphasize the finality of a lump-sum settlement and only contemplate "readjustment" if the "settlement" itself is procured by fraud; the statutes do not speak to readjusting underlying "awards" allegedly procured by fraud. Hunt v. Pick's Pack-Hauler, 23 Neb. App. 278, 869 N.W.2d 723 (2015). In order to achieve a modification of a lump-sum payment that has been approved by court order pursuant to this section on the ground of increased or decreased incapacity, a party must make an application on the ground of increase or decrease of incapacity due solely to the injury. Hubbart v. Hormel Foods Corp., 15 Neb. App. 129, 723 N.W.2d 350 (2006). Lump-sum settlements in workers' compensation actions cannot be modified in the future or be considered when determining future workers' compensation awards, because such awards are "final." Dukes v. University of Nebraska, 12 Neb. App. 539, 679 N.W.2d 249 (2004). 2. Commutation In the approval of commutation of compensation, the public has an interest which it is the duty of the court to protect without regard to the wishes of the parties. Perry v. Huffman Auto. Co., 104 Neb. 211, 175 N.W. 1021 (1920). Commutation cannot be ordered except with consent of both parties, but court must ratify. Pierce v. Boyer-Van Kuran Lumber & Coal Co., 99 Neb. 321, 156 N.W. 509 (1916); Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 99 Neb. 109, 155 N.W. 237 (1915). 3. Release A verified release results in a full and complete discharge from all liability under the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act but does not become effective until the Workers' Compensation Court files an order of dismissal with prejudice. Dragon v. Cheesecake Factory, 300 Neb. 548, 915 N.W.2d 418 (2018). By filing a release pursuant to the settlement procedures in subsection (3) of this section, a worker waives all rights under the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act, including both the right to penalties and attorney fees under section 48-125 and the right to ask a judge of the compensation court to decide the parties' rights and obligations. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Farmers Co-op, 286 Neb. 49, 835 N.W.2d 30 (2013). The filing of a release pursuant to subsection (3) of this section does not deprive the Workers' Compensation Court of jurisdiction to hear further issues in a case. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Farmers Co-op, 286 Neb. 49, 835 N.W.2d 30 (2013). The filing of a release pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, not actual payment of the lump-sum settlement, effects a discharge from liability for the employer. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Farmers Co-op, 286 Neb. 49, 835 N.W.2d 30 (2013). There is no ambiguity in the statutorily required language for a release pursuant to subsection (3) of this section. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Farmers Co-op, 286 Neb. 49, 835 N.W.2d 30 (2013).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 48-139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/48-139.