Nebraska Statutes
§ 48-1001 — Act, how cited; discrimination in employment because of age; policy; declaration of purpose
Nebraska § 48-1001
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 48Labor
This text of Nebraska § 48-1001 (Act, how cited; discrimination in employment because of age; policy; declaration of purpose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1001 (2026).
Text
(1)Sections 48-1001 to 48-1010 shall be known and may be cited as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
(2)(a) The Legislature hereby finds that the practice of discriminating in employment against properly qualified persons because of their age is contrary to American principles of liberty and equality of opportunity, is incompatible with the Constitution, deprives the state of the fullest utilization of its capacities for production, and endangers the general welfare.
(b)Hiring bias against workers forty years or more of age deprives the state of its most important resource of experienced employees, adds to the number of persons receiving public assistance, and deprives older people of the dignity and status of self-support.
(c)The right to employment otherwise lawful without
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kenneth L. Anderson v. Genuine Parts Company, Inc.
128 F.3d 1267 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Goolsby v. Anderson
549 N.W.2d 153 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
Helvering v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
703 N.W.2d 134 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2005)
Lana Starkey v. Amber Enterprises, Inc.
987 F.3d 758 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
Bobbette Blake v. MJ Optical
870 F.3d 820 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
73 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1496, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,644 Richard Newhouse, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. McCormick & Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
110 F.3d 635 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Hutson v. Wells Dairy, Inc.
578 F.3d 823 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
Humphrey v. Nebraska Public Power District
503 N.W.2d 211 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
Allen v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
423 N.W.2d 424 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
Synacek v. Omaha Cold Storage Terminals, Inc.
526 N.W.2d 91 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
Billingsley v. BFM Liquor Management, Inc.
613 N.W.2d 478 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
Richard Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., Inc., United States of America, Amicus Curiae
157 F.3d 582 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission v. State Employees Retirement System
471 N.W.2d 398 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Schultz v. WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
600 F.3d 948 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Oldfield v. Nebraska Machinery Co.
296 Neb. 469 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
Steier v. Crosier Fathers of Hastings, Neb.
492 N.W.2d 870 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
Apland v. Northeast Community College
599 N.W.2d 233 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1999)
In Re Key
255 B.R. 217 (D. Nebraska, 2000)
Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad
539 F. Supp. 134 (D. Nebraska, 1982)
Aloysius L. Maschka v. Genuine Parts Co.
122 F.3d 566 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1963, c. 281, § 1, p. 838; Laws 1972, LB 1357, § 1; Laws 2007, LB265, § 13.
Annotations: In an age discrimination suit brought under the Act Prohibiting Unjust Discrimination in Employment Because of Age, the jury is not to be instructed on the elements which constitute a submissible case. Although the ultimate burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence in an age discrimination action at all times remains with plaintiff, the method of proof is for plaintiff to prove a prima facie case; if plaintiff succeeds in proving a prima facie case, defendant has the burden of articulating some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its action. Should defendant succeed in so doing, plaintiff must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the legitimate reasons offered by defendant were not its true reasons, but a pretext for discrimination. Humphrey v. Nebraska Public Power Dist., 243 Neb. 872, 503 N.W.2d 211 (1993). Persons seeking relief under this section must allege a violation by an employer of 25 or more persons. Steier v. Crosier Fathers of Hastings, 242 Neb. 16, 492 N.W.2d 870 (1992). The federal practice for cases arising under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. sec. 621 et seq. (1982), may be instructive as to cases arising under the subject act. Allen v. AT&T Technologies, 228 Neb. 503, 423 N.W.2d 424 (1988). The state, through its Legislature, has acted to prohibit unjust discrimination in employment because of age. Midwest Employers Council, Inc. v. City of Omaha, 177 Neb. 877, 131 N.W.2d 609 (1964).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 48-1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/48-1001.