Nebraska Statutes
§ 42-371 — Judgments and orders;liens; release; subordination; procedure; time limitation on lien; security; attachment; priority
Nebraska § 42-371
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 42Households and Families
This text of Nebraska § 42-371 (Judgments and orders;liens; release; subordination; procedure; time limitation on lien; security; attachment; priority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-371 (2026).
Text
Under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act and sections 42-347 to 42-381 , 43-290 , 43-512 to 43-512.10 , and 43-1401 to 43-1418 :
(1)All judgments and orders for payment of money shall be
liens, as in other actions, upon real property and any personal property registered
with any county office and may be enforced or collected by execution and the
means authorized for collection of money judgments;
(2)The judgment creditor
may execute a partial or total release of the judgment or a document subordinating
the lien of the judgment to any other lien, generally or on specific real
or personal property.
Release of a judgment for child support or spousal support or subordination of a lien of a judgment for child support or spousal support may, if all such payments are current an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. McColery
301 Neb. 516 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Bowers v. Lens
648 N.W.2d 294 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
Klinginsmith v. Wichmann
567 N.W.2d 172 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
Lacey v. Lacey
337 N.W.2d 740 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Henke v. Guerrero
692 N.W.2d 762 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2005)
Barber v. Barber
296 N.W.2d 463 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
McCook National Bank v. Myers
503 N.W.2d 200 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
Davis v. Davis
750 N.W.2d 696 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2008)
Grosvenor v. Grosvenor
293 N.W.2d 96 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
Gallner v. Gallner
595 N.W.2d 904 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
Brockman v. Brockman
646 N.W.2d 594 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
Williams v. Williams (In Re Williams)
210 B.R. 344 (D. Nebraska, 1997)
Muller v. Muller
524 N.W.2d 78 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1994)
Gordon v. Gordon
438 N.W.2d 762 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Freis v. Harvey
563 N.W.2d 363 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
Matteson Ex Rel. Matteson v. Matteson
675 N.W.2d 366 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2004)
Fox v. Whitbeck
783 N.W.2d 774 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2010)
Bailey v. Bailey
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
In Re Melcher
416 B.R. 666 (D. Nebraska, 2009)
Koch v. Koch
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2014)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1972, LB 820, § 25; Laws 1975, LB 212, § 2; Laws 1980, LB 622, § 3; Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 19; Laws 1986, LB 600, § 9; Laws 1991, LB 715, § 3; Laws 1993, LB 500, § 52; Laws 1993, LB 523, § 3; Laws 1994, LB 1224, § 47; Laws 1997, LB 229, § 19; Laws 1999, LB 594, § 7; Laws 2004, LB 1207, § 29; Laws 2005, LB 276, § 100; Laws 2007, LB554, § 36; Laws 2008, LB1014, § 35; Laws 2011, LB673, § 1.
Cross References: Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, see section 25-1587.01. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, see section 42-701.
Annotations: 1. Applicability of section 2. Authority of court 3. Lien 4. Miscellaneous 1. Applicability of section This section is applicable to monetary property settlement judgments. Lacey v. Lacey, 215 Neb. 162, 337 N.W.2d 740 (1983). This section refers to judgment creditors for support in cases of legal separation, judgment creditors for temporary or permanent support payments or alimony, judgment creditors for child support, and judgment creditors for alimony. Grosvenor v. Grosvenor, 206 Neb. 395, 293 N.W.2d 96 (1980). In the absence of any evidence that a person ordered to pay child support was materially prejudiced by delay in assertion of claim for child support, remarriage of the parties did not operate to prohibit the party for whose benefit child support was ordered following the first divorce from instituting action following the second divorce to collect arrearages for child support due between date of the first divorce and subsequent remarriage. Scheibel v. Scheibel, 204 Neb. 653, 284 N.W.2d 572 (1979). 2. Authority of court Under subsection (6) of this section, a court has discretion to require reasonable security for an obligor's current or delinquent support obligations when compelling circumstances require it. Davis v. Davis, 275 Neb. 944, 750 N.W.2d 696 (2008). An order entered pursuant to subsection (5) of this section, requiring a person to post sufficient security, is a somewhat extraordinary and drastic remedy, and such order should be invoked only when compelling circumstances require it. Klinginsmith v. Wichmann, 252 Neb. 889, 567 N.W.2d 172 (1997). Child support payments are a vested property right of the payee as each accrues, and a court, therefore, may not forgive or modify past-due child support, but may modify the amount of future payments. Berg v. Berg, 238 Neb. 527, 471 N.W.2d 435 (1991). This section gives to a court which has entered a judgment for property division payable in installments, authority to release or subordinate the judgment under the conditions prescribed in the statute. Grosvenor v. Grosvenor, 206 Neb. 395, 293 N.W.2d 96 (1980). An order requiring security to be given and appointing a receiver are somewhat extraordinary and drastic measures and such an order should be made only when it appears to the court that such an order is necessary to assure the payment of alimony and child support as decreed. Casselman v. Casselman, 204 Neb. 565, 284 N.W.2d 7 (1979). It is not the court's prerogative to determine what method or means should be used in placing security for child support payment. Casselman v. Casselman, 204 Neb. 565, 284 N.W.2d 7 (1979). 3. Lien An appearance bond deposited by the defendant into the court registry to secure the defendant's appearance in a criminal proceeding was not personal property registered with a county office, within the meaning of the statute creating a lien on personal property of a child support obligor registered with a county office; statute limited personal property subject to lien for unpaid child support as tangible goods and chattels, and money was neither good nor chattel, but, rather, was intangible property. State v. McColery, 301 Neb. 516, 919 N.W.2d 153 (2018). Under this section, all orders and judgments for child support in the specified proceedings operate as statutory liens. Such liens attach from the date of the judgment to the obligor's real property and any personal property registered with any county officer, for arrears and as security for future obligations. Fox v. Whitbeck, 286 Neb. 134, 835 N.W.2d 638 (2013). Child support judgments do not become dormant by lapse of time, and the fact that a child support judgment ceases to be a lien by operation of subsection (5) of this section does not extinguish the judgment itself or cause it to become dormant. Fox v. Whitbeck, 280 Neb. 75, 783 N.W.2d 774 (2010). Alimony judgments are liens, and if the judgments precede a mortgage and are recorded, they will have priority over that mortgage. McCook Nat. Bank v. Myers, 243 Neb. 853, 503 N.W.2d 200 (1993). A judgment is not a lien upon the judgment debtor's equitable interest in real estate until the commencement of the creditor's bill to subject it to payment of the judgment or until execution is levied upon the interest of a judgment debtor who is in possession of the real estate in which he has the equitable interest. Action Realty Co., Inc. v. Miller, 191 Neb. 381, 215 N.W.2d 629 (1974). Pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the cessation of a lien under this section does not render a child support judgment dormant. Freis v. Harvey, 5 Neb. App. 679, 563 N.W.2d 363 (1997). 4. Miscellaneous An income withholding notice issued by the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to the Income Withholding for Child Support Act is not an "execution" within the meaning of subsection (5) of this section. Fox v. Whitbeck, 280 Neb. 75, 783 N.W.2d 774 (2010). Fees awarded under this section are the property of the client, not the attorney, and the client may execute a release of the judgment awarding fees. Barber v. Barber, 207 Neb. 101, 296 N.W.2d 463 (1980).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 42-1001
Act, how cited§ 42-1002
Definitions§ 42-1003
Formalities§ 42-1004
Content§ 42-1005
Effect of marriage§ 42-1006
Enforcement§ 42-1007
Enforcement; void marriage§ 42-1008
Limitation of actions§ 42-1009
Application and construction§ 42-101
Marriage a civil contract§ 42-1010
Severability§ 42-1011
Time of taking effect§ 42-103
Marriages; when voidCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 42-371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/42-371.