Indiana Statutes
§ 4-6-3-5 — Investigative demand; prohibited provisions
An investigative demand may not:
(1)contain a requirement that would be unreasonable if contained
in a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum issued by a court in a
grand jury investigation; or
(2)require the giving of oral testimony, the production of written
answers to interrogatories, or the production of documentary
material that would be privileged from disclosure if demanded by
a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court in aid of a grand jury
investigation.
As added by Acts 1982, P.L.20, SEC.5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indiana § 4-6-3-5 (Investigative demand; prohibited provisions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oman v. State
737 N.E.2d 1131 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2000)
Auto-Owners Insurance v. State
692 N.E.2d 935 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Auto Owners Insurance v. State
(Indiana Supreme Court, 1998)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 4-1-1-1
Dates beginning and ending§ 4-1-1-2
Reports to governor§ 4-1-10-1
Applicability§ 4-1-10-1.5
"Person"§ 4-1-10-11
Attorney general investigation of disclosures; notice to county
prosecutor and state police§ 4-1-10-12
Attorney general determination of infraction; report to appointing
authority and county prosecutor§ 4-1-10-13
Attorney general rulemaking authority§ 4-1-10-2
"State agency"§ 4-1-10-3
Nondisclosure of Social Security number§ 4-1-10-6
State agency compliance