Idaho Statutes
§ 3-104 — PRACTICING WITHOUT LICENSE A CONTEMPT — EXCEPTION
Idaho § 3-104
This text of Idaho § 3-104 (PRACTICING WITHOUT LICENSE A CONTEMPT — EXCEPTION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Code § 3-104 (2026).
Text
If any person shall practice law or hold himself out as qualified to practice law in this state without having been admitted to practice therein by the Supreme Court and without having paid all license fees now or hereafter prescribed by law for the practice of law he is guilty of contempt both in the Supreme Court and district court for the district in which he shall so practice or hold himself out as qualified to practice. Provided, that any person may appear and act in a magistrate’s division of a district court as representative of any party to a proceeding therein so long as the claim does not total more than $300, and so long as he or his employer has no pecuniary interest in the outcome of the litigation, and that he shall do so without making a charge or collecting a fee therefor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White v. Idaho Forest Industries
572 P.2d 887 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Indian Springs LLC v. Indian Springs Land Investment, LLC
215 P.3d 457 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Idaho State Bar Ass'n v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission
637 P.2d 1168 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Bettwieser
149 P.3d 857 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2006)
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Carroll
220 P.3d 1073 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Idaho State Bar v. Meservy
335 P.2d 62 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1959)
State v. Harrold
750 P.2d 959 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1988)
Matter of Depew
560 P.2d 886 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Citibank v. Miriam G. Carroll
(Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Coy v. ADA COUNTY
(D. Idaho, 2023)
Riverton Citizens Group v. Bingham County Commissioners
(Idaho Supreme Court, 2023)
Van Hook v. State
506 P.3d 887 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2022)
Legislative History
[(3-104) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 119; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 3996; C.S., sec. 6571; am. 1929, ch. 63, sec. 3, p. 92; I.C.A., sec. 3-104; am. 1969, ch. 278, sec. 1, p. 821.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 3-102
OATH§ 3-103
ROLL OF ATTORNEYS§ 3-201
DUTIES OF ATTORNEYS§ 3-202
AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY§ 3-203
CHANGE OF ATTORNEY§ 3-204
NOTICE OF CHANGE§ 3-205
ATTORNEYS’ FEES — LIEN§ 3-301
GROUNDS§ 3-303
PROCEEDINGS§ 3-401
PURPOSE OF CHAPTER§ 3-403
TIME AND MANNER OF ELECTIONCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Idaho § 3-104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/id/3-104.