Georgia Statutes
§ 17-10-36 — Establishment of unified review procedure by Supreme Court; effect on habeas corpus
Georgia·Title 17
(a)The Supreme Court of Georgia shall establish, by rules, a new unified review procedure to provide for the presentation to the sentencing court and to the Supreme Court of all possible challenges to the trial, conviction, sentence, and detention of defendants upon whom the sentence of death has been or may be imposed, which challenges before July 1, 1988, have been presented for review by the former unified review procedure under this subsection. Such new unified review procedure shall govern both pretrial and posttrial appellate review of death penalty cases.
(b)The Supreme Court shall establish, by rules, a series of check lists to be utilized by the trial court, the prosecuting attorney, and defense counsel prior to, during, and after the trial of cases in which the death penalty is
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Georgia § 17-10-36 (Establishment of unified review procedure by Supreme Court; effect on habeas corpus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newland v. Hall
527 F.3d 1162 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Devier v. Zant
3 F.3d 1445 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
Gibson v. Turpin
513 S.E.2d 186 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Ellington v. State
735 S.E.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Hammond v. State
452 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Williams v. Turpin
87 F.3d 1204 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Buttrum v. Black
721 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Georgia, 1989)
Gary v. Hall
558 F.3d 1229 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
903 F.2d 1352 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Edwards v. State
636 S.E.2d 508 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Ford v. Schofield
488 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (N.D. Georgia, 2007)
Worthy v. State
704 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Garcia-Jarquin v. State
878 S.E.2d 200 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
Putman v. Turpin
53 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (M.D. Georgia, 1999)
Hart v. State
(Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025)
Mincey v. Turpin
206 F.3d 1106 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 17-1-2
Maintenance of penal actions§ 17-10-1-4
Split sentence§ 17-10-10
Concurrent sentences