District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-705 — Jury trial; trial by court.

District of Columbia § 16-705
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 7Criminal Proceedings in the Superior Court.

This text of District of Columbia § 16-705 (Jury trial; trial by court.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-705 (2026).

Text

(a)In a criminal case tried in the Superior Court in which, according to the Constitution of the United States, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial, the trial shall be by jury, unless the defendant in open court expressly waives trial by jury and requests trial by the court, and the court and the prosecuting officer consent thereto. In the case of a trial without a jury, the trial shall be by a single judge, whose verdict shall have the same force and effect as that of a jury.
(b)In any case where the defendant is not under the Constitution of the United States entitled to a trial by jury, the trial shall be by a single judge without a jury, except that if —
(A)The defendant is charged with an offense which is punishable by a fine or penalty of more than $1,000 or by impriso

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carl v. Children's Hospital
702 A.2d 159 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
140 case citations
Adams v. United States
502 A.2d 1011 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)
43 case citations
Ford v. United States
533 A.2d 617 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
38 case citations
Fortune v. United States
59 A.3d 949 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
32 case citations
Caldwell v. United States
595 A.2d 961 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
31 case citations
Duvall v. United States
676 A.2d 448 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
27 case citations
Burgess v. United States
681 A.2d 1090 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
25 case citations
Flemming v. United States
546 A.2d 1001 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
21 case citations
Brookens v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law
538 A.2d 1120 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
18 case citations
Browner v. District of Columbia
549 A.2d 1107 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
17 case citations
Day v. United States
682 A.2d 1125 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
14 case citations
Gilberto Lopez-Ramirez v. United States
171 A.3d 169 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
12 case citations
Brown v. United States
818 A.2d 179 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
11 case citations
Davis v. United States
984 A.2d 1255 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
10 case citations
Braxton v. United States
852 A.2d 941 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
6 case citations
Fisher v. Government Employees Insurance
762 A.2d 35 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
6 case citations
Fretes-Zarate v. United States
40 A.3d 374 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
6 case citations
Berroa v. United States
763 A.2d 93 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
5 case citations
Blackledge v. United States
871 A.2d 1193 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
2 case citations
Broome v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020)

Legislative History

Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 558, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 556, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 145(d)(4); May 15, 1993, D.C. Law 9-272,§ 202, 40 DCR 796; Mar. 21, 1995, D.C. Law 10-232, § 2, 42 DCR 18; May 16, 1995, D.C. Law 10-255, § 14(a), 41 DCR 5193; May 21, 2002, D.C. Law 14-135, § 2, 49 DCR 3439

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-705.