Berroa v. United States

763 A.2d 93, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 238, 2000 WL 1474098
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 2000·No. 97-CF-1883·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the response thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion of the division, published at 745 A.2d 949 (D.C.2000), is vacated as to parts II and III, and the judgments of conviction are affirmed for the reasons stated in part I of the division’s opinion and in the en banc opinion of the court issued this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berroa v. United States, 763 A.2d 93, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 238, 2000 WL 1474098 (D.C. 2000).

763 A.2d 93 (Berroa v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KAMONTE J. LESHER v. UNITED STATES
149 A.3d 519 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Davis v. United States
984 A.2d 1255 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
York v. United States
803 A.2d 1009 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Crutchfield v. United States
779 A.2d 307 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
Berroa v. United States
763 A.2d 93 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)