District of Columbia Statutes
§ 11-2601 — Plan for furnishing representation of indigents in criminal cases.
District of Columbia § 11-2601
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 11Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]
Ch. 26Representation of Indigents in Criminal Cases.
This text of District of Columbia § 11-2601 (Plan for furnishing representation of indigents in criminal cases.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 11-2601 (2026).
Text
The Joint Committee on Judicial Administration shall place in operation, within ninety days after the effective date of this chapter, in the District of Columbia a plan for furnishing representation to any person in the District of Columbia who is financially unable to obtain adequate representation —
(1)who is charged with a felony, or misdemeanor, or other offense for which the sixth amendment to the Constitution requires the appointment of counsel or for whom, in a case in which such person faces loss of liberty, any law of the District of Columbia requires the appointment of counsel;
(2)who is under arrest, when such representation is required by law;
(3)who is charged with violating a condition of probation or parole in custody as a material witness, or seeking collateral relief
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roth, Pamela v. King, Rufus
449 F.3d 1272 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Roberts
726 F. Supp. 1359 (District of Columbia, 1989)
Family Division Trial Lawyers of the Superior court-d.c., Inc. v. H. Carl Moultrie, Chief Judge, D.C. Superior Court
725 F.2d 695 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
In Re Cleaver-Bascombe
892 A.2d 396 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
Price Ex Rel. J.P. v. District of Columbia
792 F.3d 112 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Doe v. United States
583 A.2d 670 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Jenkins v. United States
548 A.2d 102 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
Olevsky v. District of Columbia
548 A.2d 78 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
Brooks v. United States
686 A.2d 214 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Robinson v. United States
565 A.2d 964 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Williams v. United States
783 A.2d 598 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
Thompson v. Thompson
559 A.2d 311 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
United States v. Hoover-Hankerson
511 F.3d 164 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
Roth v. District of Columbia Courts
160 F. Supp. 2d 104 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Lee v. United States
597 A.2d 1333 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association v. Federal Trade Commission
856 F.2d 226 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Cloutterbuck v. Cloutterbuck
556 A.2d 1082 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America
553 F.2d 1271 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Stanton v. Chase
497 A.2d 1066 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
Marshall v. District of Columbia
458 A.2d 28 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1982)
Legislative History
Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1090, Pub. L. 93-412, § 2; June 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103-266, § 1(b)(116), 108 Stat. 713
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-101
Judicial power.§ 11-1101
Jurisdiction of the Family Court.§ 11-1104
Administration.§ 11-1106
Reports to Congress.§ 11-1201
Exclusive jurisdiction.§ 11-1202
Abolition of other remedies.§ 11-1203
Rules and regulations.§ 11-1301
Continuation of Branch.§ 11-1302
Sessions.§ 11-1322
Arbitration and conciliation.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 11-2601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/11-2601.