Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America

553 F.2d 1271, 180 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6778
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 7, 1976
Docket74-1904
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 553 F.2d 1271 (Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America, 553 F.2d 1271, 180 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6778 (D.C. Cir. 1976).

Opinions

ORDER

The suggestion of appellants Camenisch, et al. for rehearing en banc having been transmitted to the full Court and there not being a majority of the Judges in regular active service in favor of having this case reheard en banc, it is

ORDERED by the Court en banc that the aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Chief Judge BAZELON would grant appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. District of Columbia
458 A.2d 28 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Michael Wood, (Two Cases)
628 F.2d 554 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Thompson v. District of Columbia
407 A.2d 678 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Terrance Bailey
581 F.2d 984 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 F.2d 1271, 180 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-j-camenisch-ii-v-united-states-of-america-cadc-1976.