Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America
553 F.2d 1271, 180 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6778
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 7, 1976·No. 74-1904·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinions
ORDER
The suggestion of appellants Camenisch, et al. for rehearing en banc having been transmitted to the full Court and there not being a majority of the Judges in regular active service in favor of having this case reheard en banc, it is
ORDERED by the Court en banc that the aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America, 553 F.2d 1271, 180 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6778 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
553 F.2d 1271 (Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
745 F.2d 350 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
Marshall v. District of Columbia
458 A.2d 28 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1982)
In Re the Matter of Attorney's Fees and Expenses of Appointed Counsel, David G. Derickson, United States of America v. Michael Kent Poland
640 F.2d 946 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Michael Wood, (Two Cases)
628 F.2d 554 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Thompson v. District of Columbia
407 A.2d 678 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Terrance Bailey
581 F.2d 984 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Christian J. Camenisch, II v. United States of America
553 F.2d 1271 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)