Connecticut Statutes

§ 47a-26h — Persons bound by judgment. Notice. Exemption.

Connecticut § 47a-26h
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 47aLandlord and Tenant
Ch. 832Summary Process

This text of Connecticut § 47a-26h (Persons bound by judgment. Notice. Exemption.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-26h (2026).

Text

(a)A summary process judgment shall bind (1) the named defendants and any minors holding under them;
(2)any occupant who first commenced occupancy of the premises after service of the notice to quit upon which the summary process action was based, unless such occupancy was commenced or continued with the consent of the plaintiff or under a right to occupy equal or superior to the rights of the plaintiff;
(3)if the plaintiff has properly named and served each occupant whose presence is known with a notice to quit and a writ, summons and complaint in accordance with the provisions of sections 47a-23 and 47a-23a, any occupant who first commenced occupancy of the premises prior to service of the notice to quit and (A) who the plaintiff and his agents did not know was in occupancy of the pre

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogue v. Moquin, No. Spbr-9412-28487 (Jan. 25, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 466-B (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
F.G.B. Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Doe, No. Spbr-9409 27848 (Apr. 17, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4180 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Chimblo v. Hutter, No. X01 Cv 99 0162957 (Mar. 29, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4471 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Victor v. Kulak, No. Spn-0012-34560-Be (May 2, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 6305 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Wilson Properties v. Pres. Int'l Food, No. Spno 9509-17966 (Oct. 20, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12421 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)

Legislative History

(P.A. 87-507, S. 3; P.A. 89-254, S. 10; P.A. 92-171, S. 6; P.A. 95-247, S. 3; P.A. 97-231, S. 6; P.A. 12-133, S. 5; P.A. 16-67, S. 10.) History: P.A. 89-254 amended Subsec. (b) to provide that the form be prescribed by the office of the chief court administrator rather than by the judicial department and that the notice include a conspicuous notice to “all occupants not named in the judgment” rather than to “occupants”, amended Subsec. (c) to replace “Any person who claims not to be subject to a summary process judgment” with “Any occupant not named in the action who claims not to be subject to the summary process action because his occupancy commenced prior to service of the notice to quit or his occupancy commenced or continued with the consent of the plaintiff or under a right to occupy equal or superior to the rights of the plaintiff”, to replace references to “judgment” with “action”, to provide that the exemption claim form shall be prescribed by the office of the chief court administrator rather than the judicial department, to replace “If the claimant is a person not named in the judgment, the burden of proof shall be on the occupant” with “The claimant shall have the burden of proof”, to add provisions requiring the plaintiff in order to obtain a judgment for possession of the premises as part of such action to serve the previously exempt occupant with a notice to quit possession and, if the occupant is still in possession after the date to quit possession has passed, to serve the occupant with an amended writ, summons and complaint adding the occupant as a party defendant to such action, to provide that any “occupant” not exempt from the action shall have the same “obligations” as a named defendant and “shall be bound by any judgment”, and to add exception for the issuance and enforcement of an execution against a person who used the premises for the illegal sale of drugs; P.A. 92-171 amended Subsec. (a) to delete the provision that required the plaintiff, in order for the judgment to bind an occupant who first commenced occupancy prior to service of the notice to quit, to exercise reasonable diligence to discover the presence of an occupant or, if the presence of the occupant is known, to exercise reasonable diligence to discover the name of the occupant; P.A. 95-247 amended Subsec. (c) to delete provision placing burden of proof on the plaintiff to show that he “in the exercise of reasonable diligence could not have discovered” the presence or name of the occupant, reflecting deletion of same language in Subsec. (a) by P.A. 92-171; P.A. 97-231 amended Subsec. (c) to add exception for issuance and enforcement of execution upon a person who used any area within 1,500 feet of any housing authority property in which such person resides for the illegal sale of drugs; P.A. 12-133 amended Subsec. (c) by adding reference to Sec. 47a-42a; P.A. 16-67 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provision re striking a minor's name from the record. Cited. 225 C. 600. Cited. 21 CA 40; 40 CA 30.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 47a-26h, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/47a-26h.