Connecticut Statutes

§ 47a-26b — Motion and order for payments for use and occupancy.

Connecticut § 47a-26b
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 47aLandlord and Tenant
Ch. 832Summary Process

This text of Connecticut § 47a-26b (Motion and order for payments for use and occupancy.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-26b (2026).

Text

(a)If the defendant appears, the court shall, upon motion and without hearing, unless the defendant files an objection within five days of the filing of the motion, order the defendant to deposit with the court within ten days of the filing of the motion payments for use and occupancy in an amount equal to the last agreed-upon rent or, in the absence of a prior agreed-upon rent, in an amount equal to the fair rental value of the premises during the pendency of such action accruing from the date of such order. If the motion is served upon the defendant with the complaint, the motion shall be deemed for purposes of this section to have been filed on the date on which the defendant appears. If all or a portion of the defendant's rent is being paid to the plaintiff by a housing authority, mun

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Invest II v. Mental Health Subs. Abuse, No. Spbr940727340 (Feb. 10, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1214 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
3 case citations
Gray v. Coan (In Re Spiro)
305 B.R. 142 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
2 case citations
Rytman v. Colchester Foods, Inc., No. X01 Cv 88 0159961s, (Oct. 12, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13992 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Westfarms Associates v. Formal Enterprises, No. Sph 84677 (Feb. 8, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1433-G (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)

Legislative History

(P.A. 79-571, S. 53; P.A. 80-399, S. 5; 80-483, S. 129, 186; P.A. 84-266, S. 2, 4; P.A. 86-267, S. 3; P.A. 89-254, S. 9; P.A. 92-171, S. 5; P.A. 95-247, S. 2.) History: P.A. 80-399 required that hearing be held within seven days rather than five days; P.A. 80-483 made technical grammatical correction; P.A. 84-266 added provision that the last agreed-upon rent shall be prima facie evidence of the fair rental value and that the party claiming a different amount has the burden of proving otherwise; P.A. 86-267 divided section into Subsecs. and added provisions authorizing the court without hearing to order the defendant to deposit within ten days use and occupancy payments equal to the last agreed-upon rent unless the defendant files an objection, prescribing the contents of the notice of such order, specifying that the filing of a motion for use and occupancy does not suspend the pleading time limits under Sec. 47a-26a, requiring the court to hold a hearing within seven days if the defendant files an objection and order the defendant to deposit use and occupancy payments equal to the fair rental value of the premises, and specifying that nothing in Subsec. (b) precludes a subsequent motion to modify the payment amount; P.A. 89-254 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that if all or a portion of the rent is being paid by certain third parties the defendant satisfies the requirement of making use and occupancy payments by depositing with the court an amount equal to his portion of the last agreed-upon rent and to add provisions re the form and content of the motion for use and occupancy payments, designated the provisions re the notice of an order for use and occupancy payments as Subsec. (b) and required the notice be given on a form prescribed by the “office of the chief court administrator” rather than by the “judicial department”, redesignated Subsec. (b) as Subsec. (c) and added provision that if all or a portion of the rent is being paid by certain third parties the defendant satisfies the requirement by depositing with the court an amount equal to his portion of the fair rental value of the premises, and redesignated Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d); P.A. 92-171 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that the time period for depositing use and occupancy payments with the court runs from the filing of the motion rather than from the issuance of the order and to add provision that if the motion is served with the complaint it shall be deemed to have been filed on the date the defendant appears; P.A. 95-247 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that “in the absence of a prior agreed-upon rent”, use and occupancy payments shall be “in an amount equal to the fair rental value of the premises”. Cited. 4 CA 162; 17 CA 314; 19 CA 32; 20 CA 733. Where defendants already had filed their answer to the summary process complaint months before they failed to make timely use and occupancy payments, trial court erred by rendering judgment of possession for plaintiff without first conducting the hearing prescribed by Subsec. (d). 162 CA 333. Section does not provide an exclusive remedy and does not preempt plaintiff from recovering retroactive use and occupancy payments. 188 CA 714. Cited. 37 CS 688; Id., 897; 38 CS 70. Contempt remedy was inappropriate since remedy for noncompliance with statute is included within section and is self-executing. Id., 370. Cited. 40 CS 53.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 47a-26b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/47a-26b.