Connecticut Statutes
§ 46a-58 — (Formerly Sec. 53-34). Deprivation of rights. Desecration of property. Placing of burning cross or noose on property. Penalty. Restitution.
Connecticut § 46a-58
This text of Connecticut § 46a-58 ((Formerly Sec. 53-34). Deprivation of rights. Desecration of property. Placing of burning cross or noose on property. Penalty. Restitution.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-58 (2026).
Text
(a)It shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of this section for any person to subject, or cause to be subjected, any other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities, secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of this state or of the United States, on account of religion, national origin, alienage, color, race, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, blindness, mental disability, physical disability, age, status as a veteran or status as a victim of domestic violence.
(b)Any person who intentionally desecrates any public property, monument or structure, or any religious object, symbol or house of religious worship, or any cemetery, or any private structure not owned by such person, shall be in violation of subsection (a) of this sect
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ruran v. Beth El Temple of West Hartford, Inc.
226 F.R.D. 165 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Lyon v. Jones
168 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Hill v. Pinkerton Security & Investigation Services, Inc.
977 F. Supp. 148 (D. Connecticut, 1997)
Kilduff v. Cosential, Inc.
289 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
Shaw v. Greenwich Anesthesiology Associates, PC
137 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Rumbin v. Association of American Medical Colleges
803 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
Van Kruiningen v. PLAN B, LLC
485 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Beason v. United Technologies Corp.
37 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Peterson v. City of Hartford
80 F. Supp. 2d 21 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Collins v. University of Bridgeport
781 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
Wilson v. City of Norwich
507 F. Supp. 2d 199 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Bai Haiyan v. Hamden Public Schools
875 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
Valanzuolo v. City of New Haven
972 F. Supp. 2d 263 (D. Connecticut, 2013)
Mercer v. Brunt
272 F. Supp. 2d 181 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Grewcock v. Yale New Haven Health Servs. Corp.
293 F. Supp. 3d 272 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
Jackson v. Health Resources of Rockville, Inc.
357 F. Supp. 2d 507 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Hubbard v. Total Communications, Inc.
576 F. Supp. 2d 314 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
McBrearity v. Connecticut Chro, No. Cv 95 0067609 (Sep. 19, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10998 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Taylor v. State, No. Cv 98-0578141-S (Jan. 10, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 599 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Crispin v. State of Connecticut
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 8374; P.A. 74-80; P.A. 77-278, S. 1; P.A. 80-54; 80-422, S. 7; P.A. 84-15; P.A. 05-288, S. 155; P.A. 07-62, S. 1; 07-217, S. 166; P.A. 08-49, S. 1; P.A. 11-55, S. 22; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 73; P.A. 17-111, S. 1; 17-127, S. 2; P.A. 22-82, S. 11; P.A. 23-145, S. 1.) History: P.A. 74-80 applied penalty to discrimination based on sex and specified violation as class A misdemeanor, deleting penalty of maximum fine of $1,000 and/or maximum imprisonment of one year; P.A. 77-278 applied penalty to discrimination based on blindness or physical disability; P.A. 80-54 applied penalty to discrimination based on religion or national origin and added Subsecs. (b) and (c) re desecration of property and burning crosses on property; P.A. 80-422 rephrased Subsec. (a) and designated penalty provision formerly in Subsec. (a) as Subsec. (d); Sec. 53-34 transferred to Sec. 46a-58 in 1981; P.A. 84-15 amended Subsec. (d) by increasing the penalty to a class D felony if property is damaged in an amount in excess of $1,000; P.A. 05-288 made a technical change in Subsec. (c), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 07-62 amended Subsec. (a) by applying penalty to discrimination based on sexual orientation; P.A. 07-217 made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 12, 2007; P.A. 08-49 added new Subsec. (d) re placing a noose or simulation thereof on property with intent to intimidate or harass another person and redesignated existing Subsec. (d) as Subsec. (e); P.A. 11-55 amended Subsec. (a) to prohibit deprivation of rights, privileges or immunities on account of gender identity or expression; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5 amended Subsec. (a) to add “, mental disability”; P.A. 17-111 amended Subsec. (c) by adding provision re intent to intimidate or harass, amended Subsec. (d) by adding “gender identity or expression,” and “, mental disability”, amended Subsec. (e) by designating existing provisions re violation of any provision of section and exception if property damaged as Subdiv. (1) and amending same by adding provision re exception in Subdiv. (2), and adding provisions re fine not less than $1,000, adding Subdiv. (2) re intentional desecration of house of religious worship, adding Subdiv. (3) re remitting or reducing fine amount and adding Subdiv. (4) re restitution, and made technical changes; P.A. 17-127 amended Subsecs. (a) and (d) to add “status as a veteran” and made technical changes; P.A. 22-82 amended Subsecs. (a) and (d) by adding “status as a victim of domestic violence” and by making technical changes; P.A. 23-145 amended Subsecs. (a) and (d) by adding “age”, effective July 1, 2023. Annotation to former section 53-34: If no violation of enumerated rights under statute is alleged, there is no basis for hearing. 160 C. 226. Annotations to present section: Cited. 204 C. 17; 216 C. 108; 232 C. 91; 238 C. 337. Subsec. (a): Cited. 216 C. 85; 220 C. 192. Commission had subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate claim of racial discrimination brought by African-American senior student at a public high school against school principal and local board of education on the basis of a discrete course of allegedly discriminatory conduct by the principal. 270 C. 665. Trial court should not have remanded case to referee because employer was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law where plaintiff was denied promotion because of failure to obtain same license as required for prior job occupants and where license requirement was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason and not pretextual. 272 C. 457. The statutory text unambiguously permits the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities to identify violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and to award damages and attorney's fees for those violations. 343 C. 90. Commission has authority to identify ADA violations for purposes of determining whether Subsec. is violated. 344 C. 603. Cited. 18 CA 126; 38 CA 506; 44 CA 446; Id., 677. Federal standards reviewed for guidance in enforcing state antidiscrimination statutes; court held that defendant had provided plaintiff with reasonable accommodation. 57 CA 767. In claim alleging discrimination based on religion in violation of Subsec. predicated on series of events, including court order placing children in temporary custody of Commissioner of Children and Families, filing of neglect petitions, placement of children with practicing Christian couple instead of a Muslim family and court order terminating parental rights, claim barred by the absolute immunity afforded by the litigation privilege. 220 CA 77.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 46a-11
Duties and powers of director.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 46a-58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/46a-58.