Connecticut Statutes
§ 46a-101 — Release of pending complaint alleging discriminatory practice. Expedited case assessment review. Time period for bringing action after release.
Connecticut § 46a-101
This text of Connecticut § 46a-101 (Release of pending complaint alleging discriminatory practice. Expedited case assessment review. Time period for bringing action after release.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-101 (2026).
Text
(a)No action may be brought in accordance with section 46a-100 unless the complainant has received a release from the commission in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(b)The complainant and the respondent, by themselves or their attorneys, may jointly request that the complainant receive a release from the commission at any time from the date of filing the complaint. The complainant or the complainant's attorney may request a release from the commission if the complaint is still pending after the expiration of one hundred eighty days from the date of its filing or after a case assessment review in accordance with subsection (c) of section 46a-83 , whichever is earlier. The executive director or the executive director's designee shall conduct an expedited case assessment revi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anderson v. Derby Board of Education
718 F. Supp. 2d 258 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
Martin v. Town of Westport
558 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
White v. Martin
23 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D. Connecticut, 1998)
Lunardini v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
696 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
Anthony v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
621 F. App'x 49 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Catalano v. Bedford Associates, Inc.
9 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D. Connecticut, 1998)
O'Hazo v. Bristol-Burlington Health District
599 F. Supp. 2d 242 (D. Connecticut, 2009)
Kotec v. Japanese Educational Institute of New York
321 F. Supp. 2d 428 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Collins v. University of Bridgeport
781 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
Spector v. Boardof Trustees of Community-Technical Colleges
463 F. Supp. 2d 234 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
Jackson v. Post University, Inc.
836 F. Supp. 2d 65 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
Pleau v. Centrix, Inc.
501 F. Supp. 2d 321 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Boateng v. Apple Health Care, Inc.
156 F. Supp. 2d 247 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Peltier v. Apple Health Care, Inc.
130 F. Supp. 2d 285 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
Hannah v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
969 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D. Connecticut, 2013)
Bouchard v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
716 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
Mehta v. the Wiremold Company, No. Cv 94 0533970 (Mar. 17, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2648 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Duncan v. Junior Achievement, Inc., No. Cv96 033 58 78 S (Apr. 24, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 5649 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
W. v. Yale University
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Ortiz v. University of Connecticut
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Legislative History
(P.A. 91-331, S. 2; P.A. 98-245, S. 7, 14; P.A. 11-237, S. 14; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 85.) History: P.A. 98-245 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision that complainant and respondent may jointly request that the complainant receive a release at any time from date of filing the complaint until 210 days from the date of filing the complaint, effective July 1, 1998, and applicable to all cases pending with the commission or in the courts and cases filed on or after said date; P.A. 11-237 amended Subsec. (b) by making technical changes, deleting provision re expiration of 210 days from filing complaint, replacing provisions re requesting release of pending complaint after expiration of 210 days with provisions allowing such request by earlier of 180 days of its filing or after merit assessment review, and adding provision re expedited merit assessment review; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5 amended Subsec. (b) by substituting “case assessment” for “merit assessment”, replacing reference to Sec. 46a-83(b) with reference to Sec. 46a-83(c) and deleting reference to “the complainant's attorney”, and amended Subsecs. (c) and (e) by making technical changes (Revisor's note: In Subsec. (b), an additional reference to Sec. 46a-83(b) was replaced editorially by the Revisors with reference to Sec. 46a-83(c) for accuracy, in accordance with Sec. 2-56f). Cited. 231 C. 328; 236 C. 681. Cited. 44 CA 446. Subsec. (e): Ninety-day time limitation for commencing action in Superior Court is mandatory, subject to waiver and equitable tolling, and not subject matter jurisdictional. 213 CA 128.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 46a-11
Duties and powers of director.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 46a-101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/46a-101.