Connecticut § 31-243 Continuous jurisdiction.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 31-243 — Continuous jurisdiction.

Connecticut § 31-243

Title 31Labor

Ch. 567Unemployment Compensation

This text of Connecticut § 31-243 (Continuous jurisdiction.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-243 (2026).

Text

Jurisdiction over benefits shall be continuous but the initiating of a valid appeal under section 31-242 or the pendency of valid appellate proceedings under section 31-249 shall, if the appellate tribunal has taken jurisdiction, stay any proceeding hereunder, but only in respect to the same period and the same parties, but shall not cause the cessation of payment of benefits as provided by section 31-242. Where the appellate tribunal has not taken jurisdiction, upon his own initiative, or upon application of any party in interest, the administrator, or the examiner designated by him, may, at any time within six months after the date of the original decision, or within such other time limits as may be applicable under section 31-273, review an award of benefits or the denial of a claim the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jurisdiction over benefits shall be continuous but the initiating of a valid appeal under section 31-242 or the pendency of valid appellate proceedings under section 31-249 shall, if the appellate tribunal has taken jurisdiction, stay any proceeding hereunder, but only in respect to the same period and the same parties, but shall not cause the cessation of payment of benefits as provided by section 31-242. Where the appellate tribunal has not taken jurisdiction, upon his own initiative, or upon application of any party in interest, the administrator, or the examiner designated by him, may, at any time within six months after the date of the original decision, or within such other time limits as may be applicable under section 31-273, review an award of benefits or the denial of a claim therefor, in accordance with the procedure prescribed in respect to claims, and may issue a new decision, which may award, terminate, continue, increase or decrease such benefits. Such new decision shall be appealable under the provisions of section 31-242 within the time prescribed in section 31-241, and where the claimant has been free from fault, a redetermination or new decision shall not affect benefits paid under a prior order. Any decision to review an award of benefits or the denial of a claim under this section shall be solely within the discretion of the administrator and shall not be appealable under the provisions of section 31-242.

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7515; 1971, P.A. 835, S. 24; P.A. 77-604, S. 20, 84; P.A. 92-210, S. 2.) History: 1971 act specified effect of appeals on proceedings and payment of benefits, added reference to time limits “applicable under section 31-273” in provision re review and specified that new decision is appealable under Sec. 31-242 rather than subject to review; P.A. 77-604 made technical correction substituting “affect” for “effect”; P.A. 92-210 added language providing that the administrator or examiner may review an award of benefits or denial of a claim where the appellate tribunal has not taken jurisdiction, deleted requirement for a change in conditions as grounds for review, and added language providing that decision to review shall be solely within the discretion of the administrator and shall not be appealable under Sec. 31-242. Permits change of decision because of modifying circumstances and is limited to that. 161 C. 362. A limitation on administrator's power to oppose plaintiff's appeal does not exist under statute. 192 C. 104. Cited. Id., 581. Administrator without power to review a decision made more than 6 months previously. 20 CS 107. Recovery of overpayment, when. 30 CS 123.