Connecticut Statutes
§ 31-242 — Referee's hearing of claim on appeal from examiner: Decision, notices, remand; disqualification of referee, challenge.
Connecticut § 31-242
This text of Connecticut § 31-242 (Referee's hearing of claim on appeal from examiner: Decision, notices, remand; disqualification of referee, challenge.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-242 (2026).
Text
Unless such appeal is withdrawn, a referee shall promptly hear the claim, de novo, and render a decision thereon. Unless a party has waived the notice or agreed to a shorter period of time, notice, by mail or otherwise, of the time and place of such hearing shall be given each interested party not less than five days prior to the date appointed therefor. The parties, including the administrator, shall be notified of the referee's decision, which notification shall be accompanied by a finding of the facts and the conclusions of law upon which the decision is based. The referee may, for good cause, issue a decision which remands the case to the administrator for such further proceedings as the referee may reasonably direct. Such hearing shall be held by the referee designated by the chief re
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rotert v. Jefferson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
623 F. Supp. 1114 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
Aitchison v. Admin., Unemp. Comp. Act, No. Cv 95 0067140 (Jul. 19, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8280 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Parikh v. Administrator, No. Cv97-74632 (Jun. 12, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7310 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Lehoux v. Administrator, No. Cv 95 0069891 (May 21, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4034-II (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7514; 1971, P.A. 835, S. 23; P.A. 74-339, S. 15, 36; P.A. 87-364, S. 2, 8; P.A. 16-169, S. 7.) History: 1971 act deleted “congressional” with references to districts; P.A. 74-339 referred to referees rather than commissioners, authorized waiver of notice or agreement to shorter time period by interested parties and added provisions re challenges to interest of referees; P.A. 87-364 provided that the referee may remand the case to the administrator for good cause; P.A. 16-169 made technical changes. Expenses of appeal denied where not claimed before administrator. 133 C. 310. Cited. 135 C. 696; 161 C. 362. Cited re section's effect on the speed and fairness of the resolution of contested claims. 175 C. 269. Cited. 192 C. 581; 200 C. 243. Cited. 1 CA 591; 2 CA 1; 34 CA 620. Only employers whose merit rating accounts were charged with compensable separations have right to appeal from original award. 15 CS 62. Commissioner limited in his decision to the period covered by the decision of the examiner. 18 CS 11. Cited. 21 CS 19; 27 CS 217. Case remanded to commissioner for further proceedings where decision made was not specific as to dates of claimant's ineligibility for benefits on grounds of his failure to make reasonable efforts to find work. 28 CS 248. Cited. 37 CS 38; 44 CS 285.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 31-101
Definitions.§ 31-102
State Board of Labor Relations.§ 31-103
Appointment and removal of agent. Testimonial privilege. Appointment and removal of legal counsel.§ 31-104
Rights of employees.§ 31-105
Unfair labor practices.§ 31-106
Election of representatives.§ 31-107a
Application for transcript. Costs.§ 31-109
Enforcement of orders. Appeals.§ 31-11
Hindering inspector.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 31-242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/31-242.