Connecticut Statutes

§ 31-235 — Benefit eligibility conditions; qualifications; involuntary retirees. Reemployment services. Profiling system.

Connecticut § 31-235
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 31Labor
Ch. 567Unemployment Compensation

This text of Connecticut § 31-235 (Benefit eligibility conditions; qualifications; involuntary retirees. Reemployment services. Profiling system.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-235 (2026).

Text

(a)An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if it has been found that (1) such individual has made claim for benefits in accordance with the provisions of section 31-240 and has registered for work at the public employment bureau or other agency designated by the administrator within such time limits, with such frequency and in such manner as the administrator may prescribe, provided failure to comply with this condition may be excused by the administrator upon a showing of good cause therefor;
(2)except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, such individual is physically and mentally able to work and is available for work and has been and is making reasonable efforts to obtain work, provided the individual shall not be consider

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinberg v. Fusari
364 F. Supp. 922 (D. Connecticut, 1973)
30 case citations
Ertman v. Fusari
442 F. Supp. 1147 (D. Connecticut, 1977)
6 case citations
Gordon v. Adm., Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv98-0412917 (Sep. 30, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 13129 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7507; 1953, S. 3072d; February, 1965, P.A. 550, S. 4; 1967, P.A. 790, S. 13, 23; 1971, P.A. 835, S. 14; P.A. 73-106; 73-160; 73-671; P.A. 83-184, S. 1, 2; 83-470, S. 1, 3; P.A. 94-116, S. 15, 28; P.A. 05-288, S. 137; P.A. 06-171, S. 1; P.A. 12-197, S. 36; P.A. 21-141, S. 8; 21-196, S. 55.) History: 1965 act changed wage amount referred to in Subdiv. (3) from $300 to $750; 1967 act changed amount referred to in Subdiv. (3) to thirty times his benefit rate for total unemployment; 1971 act deleted provision in Subdiv. (2) which had prohibited requiring women to be available for work between one and six a.m.; P.A. 73-106 changed wage amount in Subdiv. (3) from thirty to forty times the benefit rate “or one and one-half times the amount of his total wages paid during that quarter of his current benefit year's base period in which such wages were highest”, deleting proviso requiring that wages or earnings occur in two different calendar quarters; P.A. 73-160 added proviso re persons 62 or older who are involuntarily retired; P.A. 73-671 deleted optional wage amount of one and one-half total wages paid during quarter in which wages were highest in Subdiv. (3); P.A. 83-184 prohibited the administrator from using prior “patterns of unemployment” in determining the individual's availability for work and defined the term; P.A. 83-470 provided that a claimant shall not be considered to be unavailable for work solely because he is a student during his period of unemployment, and he shall not be considered to be lacking in his efforts to get work if he restricts his efforts to employment which does not conflict with his school hours, within the limitations established in new Subsec. (b); (Revisor's note: In 1991 the reference in Subsec. (a) to “subsection (6)” was changed editorially by the Revisors to read “subsection (a)(6)”); P.A. 94-116 added (a)(4) requiring a claimant to participate in reemployment services if the individual has determined to be more likely than not to exhaust regular benefits and need reemployment services, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 05-288 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 06-171 made technical changes for the purpose of gender neutrality and added Subsec. (c) providing that unemployed individual with physical or mental impairment who satisfies specified requirements may limit availability for work to part-time employment and establishing considerations for determining whether requirements have been satisfied; P.A. 12-197 amended Subsec. (c)(1)(A) by adding provision allowing documentation from an advanced practice registered nurse; P.A. 21-141 amended Subsec. (a) by adding Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment program re determination of likelihood of individual exhausting regular benefits and needing reemployment services in Subdiv. (4), adding “for purposes of the profiling system only,” in Subdiv. (4)(A) and requiring administrator to adopt regulations for administration of Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment program, effective July 7, 2021; P.A. 21-196 amended Subsec. (c)(1) by adding reference to physician assistant and making a technical change. “Available for work” construed with respect to waitress. 126 C. 441. Depends on whether or not there is a labor market for the work employee can do. 132 C. 651. Deliberate violation of reasonable rule in connection with work constitutes “wilful misconduct”. 133 C. 308. Rule forbidding solicitation for union membership in working hours reasonable. Id., 310. The word “paid” does not mean “payable”, and since all wages paid plaintiff were paid to him in one calendar quarter, he was not eligible to receive unemployment benefits. 135 C. 667. Cited. 136 C. 389. Section is constitutional; does not impair vested rights. 137 C. 129. A claimant who limits his availability for work because of personal reasons not related to the employment is not entitled to compensation. Id., 438. Plaintiff eligible for benefits for period of shutdown beyond the 1-week vacation to which he was entitled. 138 C. 253. Under former statute, disqualification for attending school did not apply after applicant had completed his studies. 139 C. 71. Power of court over commissioner's administrative decisions is very limited. Id., 588. Cited. 171 C. 318. Delay of 1,000 days in appellate determination of denial of unemployment benefits constitutes good cause for suspending reporting requirement. 175 C. 269. Cited. Id., 562; 184 C. 317; 205 C. 623; 209 C. 381. Cited. 3 CA 264; 4 CA 183. “Quit to care” provision does not apply as an exception to the availability provision of section. 34 CA 620. Qualifications to make claimant eligible for compensation are conditions precedent and burden of proof is on him. 15 CS 286. Cited. 20 CS 10; Id., 214; 44 CS 285. Subsec. (a)(2): To be available for work one must be ready, able and willing to accept suitable employment; must be exposed unequivocally to the labor market; eligibility for unemployment compensation discussed. 142 C. 160. Plaintiff attending school during the day held not available for work as he limited his availability for “first shift” work for a personal reason unrelated to his employment. 148 C. 475. Mere fact that person places certain restrictions on type of work he is willing to accept does not, in itself, make him unavailable for work within intent and meaning of section; work at a lesser skill and lower wages should not be deemed suitable unless claimant has been given a reasonable period in which to compete in the labor market for available jobs at his higher skill or related skills. 150 C. 278. Uncontroverted testimony concerning efforts to find work and willingness to rearrange a college schedule do not establish rights to benefits where referee not convinced that plaintiff would or could rearrange class schedule and that she was looking for work. 174 C. 527. Cited. 177 C. 132. Claimant's primary devotion to self-employment activities in business open 7 days a week with one other person who lacked relevant business expertise renders claimant unavailable for work and disqualifies him from receiving benefits. 139 CA 26. “Available for work”; affected by pregnancy. 7 CS 375; 13 CS 32. Conclusion that claimant with two badly broken legs could not perform any work was justified. 10 CS 186. As affects persons who can accept employment only at certain hours or on certain shifts because of domestic responsibilities. 12 CS 122; 13 CS 101; Id., 109; 16 CS 334; 17 CS 316. Wife who voluntarily left employment to reside in a distant area where husband was stationed wherein suitable opportunities were restricted was not “available”. 13 CS 423. In absence of finding that claimant refused to accept work, conclusion that she was not “available” was unwarranted. 15 CS 50. “Available for work” means available for employer's work and not necessarily for some other work. 17 CS 142. Availability is to be decided upon what claimant does and not upon the existence of regulation foreign to act which bars employers from hiring. Id., 318. State employee who voluntarily retires and is not willing to work for state because of loss of pension is not available for work and not entitled to benefits. 22 CS 99. One who limits his availability for work because of personal reasons unrelated to employment is not entitled to compensation. 23 CS 86. Claimant has burden not only to accept referral but also to make opportunity fruitful; where such person did not report for interview because he forgot, he was held ineligible for benefits. Id., 188. Cited. Id., 208. Search for work amounting to a few hours a day or one day a week held not to meet “reasonable effort” requirement of Subdiv. 24 CS 492. Applying to one or two places a week held as not making reasonable effort to obtain work. Id., 507. Where cessation of work was voluntary on plaintiff's part, through agency of union, plaintiffs could not be said to be “available for work”. 25 CS 294–296. Unemployment commissioner's conclusion that plaintiff was not physically able to engage in work so as to be “available for work” was sufficiently supported by subordinate facts when plaintiff had qualified for Social Security disability benefits. Id., 447. “Reasonable efforts” defined; not unreasonable or arbitrary for commissioner to find that plaintiff's one or two attempts to find work each week did not constitute reasonable effort; courts are bound by findings of subordinate facts and reasonable conclusions of facts made by commissioner. 26 CS 336. Where plaintiff did not go to more than 3 establishments in person in any week in her search for work, she failed to meet statutory requirement that she make reasonable efforts to obtain work. 27 CS 38. Burden of proving work availability of claimant. 29 CS 316. When telephone operator ineligible for benefits. Id., 492. Bona fide attempt to obtain temporary full-time job satisfies availability for work requirement. 31 CS 4. Seasonal worker who makes a bona fide attempt to obtain a temporary full-time job satisfies the requirements of availability set forth in section. Id., 238. Cited. 32 CS 3.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 31-235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/31-235.