California Statutes
§ 1368. — 1368. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2.)
California § 1368.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code PENPenal Code - PEN
Title10.
Part 2.TITLE 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS
Ch. 6.CHAPTER 6. Inquiry into the Competence of the Defendant Before Trial or After Conviction
This text of California § 1368. (1368. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Penal Code - PEN Code § 1368. (2026).
Text
(a)If, during the pendency of an action and prior to judgment, or during revocation proceedings for a violation of probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole, a doubt arises in the mind of the judge as to the mental competence of the defendant, the judge shall state that doubt in the record and inquire of the attorney for the defendant whether, in the opinion of the attorney, the defendant is mentally competent. If the defendant is not represented by counsel, the court shall appoint counsel. At the request of the defendant or defendant’s counsel or upon its own motion, the court shall recess the proceedings for as long as may be reasonably necessary to permit counsel to confer with the defendant and to form an
opinion as to the mental competence o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stanley v. Cullen
633 F.3d 852 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Mike Hernandez v. Eddie S. Ylst, Warden
930 F.2d 714 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Joseph Anthony Smith v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent
826 F.2d 872 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Atayde v. Napa State Hospital
255 F. Supp. 3d 978 (E.D. California, 2017)
Fred Kipp Bassett v. D. J. McCarthy
549 F.2d 616 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
William A. Greenfield v. J. P. Gunn, Warden
556 F.2d 935 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Huu Thanh Nguyen v. Silvia Garcia, Warden Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Director, Director of Corrections, California State Department of Corrections
477 F.3d 716 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Delaney Marks v. Ronald Davis
106 F.4th 941 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Arthur v. Sheriff
325 F. Supp. 1320 (C.D. California, 1971)
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
(N.D. California, 2024)
(PC) Miles v. Schubert
(E.D. California, 2023)
Kelvin Cheung v. California Attorney General
(C.D. California, 2019)
Briseno v. Woodford
413 F. App'x 2 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Nguyen v. Garcia
(Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Stallings v. Ferrera
(E.D. California, 2021)
Kenneth Martin v. Rains
(C.D. California, 2020)
Watkins v. State of California
(N.D. California, 2019)
Odanga v. Jordar
(S.D. California, 2023)
Allaf-Motedayen v. Sonoma County Child Protective Services
(N.D. California, 2025)
Yaqub v. Paynter.
(E.D. California, 2024)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2. (SB 1323) Effective January 1, 2025.
Nearby Sections
6
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 1368., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/PEN/1368..