California Statutes

§ 1368. — 1368. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2.)

California·Code PEN Penal Code - PEN·Title 10.·Part 2. TITLE 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS·Ch. 6. CHAPTER 6. Inquiry into the Competence of the Defendant Before Trial or After Conviction
(a)If, during the pendency of an action and prior to judgment, or during revocation proceedings for a violation of probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole, a doubt arises in the mind of the judge as to the mental competence of the defendant, the judge shall state that doubt in the record and inquire of the attorney for the defendant whether, in the opinion of the attorney, the defendant is mentally competent. If the defendant is not represented by counsel, the court shall appoint counsel. At the request of the defendant or defendant’s counsel or upon its own motion, the court shall recess the proceedings for as long as may be reasonably necessary to permit counsel to confer with the defendant and to form an opinion as to the mental competence o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 1368. (1368. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanley v. Cullen
633 F.3d 852 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
271 case citations
Mike Hernandez v. Eddie S. Ylst, Warden
930 F.2d 714 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
168 case citations
Joseph Anthony Smith v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent
826 F.2d 872 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
65 case citations
Atayde v. Napa State Hospital
255 F. Supp. 3d 978 (E.D. California, 2017)
25 case citations
Fred Kipp Bassett v. D. J. McCarthy
549 F.2d 616 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
16 case citations
William A. Greenfield v. J. P. Gunn, Warden
556 F.2d 935 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
16 case citations
Delaney Marks v. Ronald Davis
106 F.4th 941 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
8 case citations
Arthur v. Sheriff
325 F. Supp. 1320 (C.D. California, 1971)
1 case citations
(PC) Miles v. Schubert
(E.D. California, 2023)
Briseno v. Woodford
413 F. App'x 2 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Nguyen v. Garcia
(Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Stallings v. Ferrera
(E.D. California, 2021)
Kenneth Martin v. Rains
(C.D. California, 2020)
Watkins v. State of California
(N.D. California, 2019)
Odanga v. Jordar
(S.D. California, 2023)
Yaqub v. Paynter.
(E.D. California, 2024)

Legislative History

Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 646, Sec. 2. (SB 1323) Effective January 1, 2025.

Nearby Sections

6
View on official source ↗